May 24

Inevitable Conclusion

In which Apple destroys my daughter’s iPad forever.

If it’s not on your home network, stored on a device you control completely, it’s not yours. It belongs to someone else and they can do with it what they will.

Most of ya’ll are one day going to lose all your shit, and you don’t even know it. But it’ll be gone and I can say, “I told you so.” And I damn sure will — while I still have all of mine because I have it on hardware I control, and I back it up. The “cloud” is a con.

May 22

8Kool

Are idiots like this fucking blind?

I can tell the difference between a 5K and a 4K display easily at a 10 foot distance. Easily. It’s not even a challenge. I could do it with one eye closed and standing on my head.

Of course, that fucknugget isn’t even right because (as a commenter later points out), anti-aliasing and color blending also gets better the more pixels you have to work with. That is a very noticeable difference to nearly anyone, by the way.

That said, in most situations, 8K is about the limit of what I can resolve at normal viewing distances. In certain situations, I think I could tell the difference up to about 30K, but there is no practical reason to ever make monitors of that resolution.

I’ve lived through these debates before. I remember when 800×600 screens started coming out in the late 1980s and there was a huge fracas about how that resolution was unnecessary, was ruining computing, no one needed anything that sharp or that large, etc. Check out Byte magazine, Antic and others from that era if you can find them.

May 22

Danse

One of my favorite classical pieces.

The first violinist is not playing it in a completely classical style, and the work is all the better for it.

May 21

Face

What’s sad about this preserved bit of 1996 from the WSJ is that it’s interface is much more usable, the design much better, and it is of course much faster than nearly anything built now. It doesn’t attempt to load enormous javascript frameworks, doesn’t have menus that fly out and disappear randomly, and just in general presents the data in a discoverable, readable format. (And there were much better designs than this around at the time.)

Yes, it looks a little strange, as at that time the standard screen size was 1024×768 with many people still having 800×600 screens. It is optimized for a small-resolution screen (in pixel terms) and for dial-up.

That makes it better, though, not worse. Having to load 10MB+ of a javascript framework only benefits the designers who have to code less to get features most people don’t notice or care about, not users.

I miss the old internet. The new, “improved” one is terrible in comparison — even if you don’t take all the data-stealing and info-peddling into account.

May 21

Conflict

Most — if not all — of sexual market conflict consists of one side insisting fervently that the other side’s dealbreakers are morally flawed or otherwise unacceptable.

It seems like we could do better, but I don’t know how.

May 20

Boomer Clues

Sometimes — ok, all the time — I wonder what the fuck is wrong with Kevin Drum.

That said, this chart probably understates Newark’s income growth anyway. It includes only ordinary wage income, not income from dividends or interest or capital gains or Social Security or any other government transfers. Nor does it include noncash income like Medicaid or CHIP. If you add in all those things, the life of the average Newark resident hasn’t gotten 50 percent better since 1975, it’s gotten more like 100 percent better.

Why is it so very difficult for Boomers to understand that even if (and Drum’s data is extremely flawed, but we’ll leave that for now) your income on paper goes up by a good bit, that if the essentials of life also vastly increase in price, then the income “increase” is just spreadsheet fuckery?

Drum, check this out.

In 1940, the median home value in the U.S. was $2,938. By 2000, it had risen to $119,600 and today it’s just over $200,000. Even adjusted for inflation, the median home price in 1940 would only have been $30,600 in 2000 dollars.

Yes, the quality has improved somewhat and also the size has increased, but that all means less than nothing when you can’t afford anything that exists in the market.

What about college expenses, though? Not the below increases are after inflation is already accounted for.

Education costs have risen at an alarming rate as well. College Board’s “Trends in College Pricing 2017” report examines changes in tuition rates over time, showing how much more the class of 2018 is expected to pay than their parents did.

It’s a lot.

Students at public four-year institutions paid an average of $3,190 in tuition for the 1987-1988 school year, with prices adjusted to reflect 2017 dollars. Thirty years later, that average has risen to $9,970 for the 2017-2018 school year. That’s a 213 percent increase.

If you go back even further, it’s far more. Drum went to college nearly free in the 1970s, as did many people of his cohort.

What about health care? Oh, look, same story.

On a per capita basis, health spending has increased nearly 29-fold over the last four decades, from $355 per person in 1970 to $10,348 in 2016. In constant 2016 Dollars, the increase was almost 6-fold from $1,762 In 1970 to $10,348 in 2016.

What about child care costs? It’s more difficult to find time series data here, but this seems pretty typical.

After their mortgage — which is about 20 percent of their combined take-home pay — child care is the family’s biggest expense. In fact, the cost of their youngest child’s day care alone — $660 a month — is more than half the family’s monthly mortgage payment.

In other words, all the important parts of life have gotten vastly more expensive, while the non-necessities (bigger TVs) have also gotten vastly cheaper. And Drum wonders why people feel downtrodden and despair of the future.

Not so hard to comprehend when you look at anything relevant for a single second, instead of living in Drum’s fantasia.