Feb 20

PUOM

The good thing about if I ever became a billionaire is that I’m already as big a jerk as I’m ever going to be. It wouldn’t change me much. I’d probably just give away a lot of the money, not fake give it away like a lot of billionaires do.

People would still get angry at me, though, because I’d do an expedition to Mars just so I could put a pull-up bar on Hellas Planitia. And when people asked me, “Mike, why’d you put a pull-up bar on Mars?” I’d say, “DUH, so I could do a pull-up on Mars, what are you, some kind of dumbass?”

Well, you see what I mean.

Feb 20

Unavoidable Complexity

Turns out all those crazy things (and more) were true. Occam’s Razor is only useful if you don’t know anything else. Complexity is unavoidable when it matches actual features of the universe.

Feb 20

The Gate

Intellectuals tend to want to make things more complicated than they must be because it excludes others and keeps the barriers to entry high. Sometimes, the world is complex. That is unavoidable. But a lot of what you see is artificially convoluted; this is unnecessary and is about protecting existing power and is designed for gatekeeping.

Feb 19

“Unskilled”

Agreed. You’d have to quadruple my salary (and I don’t make a small salary) for me to even considering doing that job. It’s just too hard.

And then I still would not do it.

Feb 19

Lemon

This is a real-life example of the Baudrillardian simulation replacing the real, obliterating it completely.

The woman had likely never smelled a real lemon (even if she had seen them in grocery stores), but had only experienced lemon-scented products. Thus, “lemon” to her was not connected to anything other than itself. It did not exist apart from its product associations and their scents.

I see examples of this fairly often, but this is pretty egregious one.

Feb 19

Brand New

On a brand-new install of Windows Server 2019, I search for “powershell” (which this computer definitely has installed, it’s a default) and nothing:

How can you make something so broken?

Feb 19

Case One

I was reading this interview with Kristen Roupenian (found by way of my friend’s blog) and though I liked it, I still have trouble wondering why there is such a push, after all the victories of feminism, to re-infantilize women.

This appears to be something many women actually want. Are women more immature, childish, than men at the same age? I have never found that to be the case but perhaps it is now true. I don’t know. And while I have no desire to date or sleep with twenty-year-olds in general, I can’t help but frame this as more about elimination of dating market competition than any other imperative.

I think Roupenian herself is a more nuanced writer than that, but many people (mostly women) want to downgrade women to naifs barely capable of making their own decisions.

Perhaps we should raise the age of majority of women to 35? Would that make feminists happy, that women are legally considered children until that age?

I don’t feel much different than I did at 20, or act much differently, though I am a lot less angry. Is that not the same for women? What’s going on here, apart from dating market competition?

Feb 19

Cism What

Note first that I think barring non-English speakers from anywhere is a truly atrocious idea. Just absurdly stupid.

However…racism? So, disallowing a 6’4″ blond white Swedish dude who only speaks Swedish is racism? Can someone please explain this “innovative” new definition of racism the left is using, because I can’t say I understand.

Note that this would not bar the majority of Nigerians, who are almost all black, because 53% of Nigerians speak English. So…racism is looking awfully different these days.

Feb 19

Nukeberg

Well, he’s not wrong, though I think the DNC has mostly settled on the Bloomberg strategy to nuke Bernie.