Iโm not sure why I was reading this post as itโs about something that doesnโt really interest me, but I am glad I did for this portion and what follows.
I’m frequently confronted with a very seductive, corrupting empirical failing: the tendency to think “that which I cannot measure is not real.”
I see this all the time among the more empirically-minded. Even when statistical tools are used to guard (sort of) against this error of human cognition, people still fall prey to it, and to a huge extent, too.
Iโm a weird hybrid โ I straddle fields of human endeavor. Iโm as comfortable reading a scientific paper in nearly any field as I am an analysis of the transition from Mannerism to Baroque, as interested in art and languages as I am in quantum chromodynamics. It might not be possible these days to be a polymath, but I still try. And sometimes I even succeed. (And no, I donโt enjoy being seen to be smart. I would do this if I were the only person left on earth. Even more so than I do now, as Iโd have more time!)
Dancing lightly through so many fields, even if I am not truly skilled in them, I often notice fallacies and errors that others in those fields, having little experience and no knowledge of anything else, do not notice.
This โmeasurement fallacyโ is one I see nearly everywhere. Itโs sort of like misogyny that way, alas โ once your eyes are open to it, it appears all over the place.
Iโm not really sure how to combat it, as you canโt make people see something that is invisible to them. But once you do notice it, itโs just about everywhere.