There’s no way to prevent cheating or heartbreak. It either happens or it doesn’t. Love is like weather. That’s all.
— Natalia Antonova 🇺🇸🇺🇦 (@NataliaAntonova) November 10, 2026
Modern women’s (mostly) quest to make romantic heartbreak illegal is absolutely insane to a level I had not previously contemplated.
I don’t give a fuck about Jensen Huang’s affairs. I do care that he was probably committing treason by illegally selling restricted technology to China.
You can tell how mentally incompetent Gen Z is because they are moralizing over the stupid affairs and age gaps while ignoring the real issue. Fucking idiot dipshit-ass clowns.
So, safetyism is making large language models insane in a potentially dangerous way. I am somehow not the least bit surprised to learn this. https://t.co/HWdtULaOvo
— Eric S. Raymond (@esrtweet) November 6, 2026
Safety (and the resultant safetyism) the way the AI companies are doing it is utterly moronic and harms us all.
This is, quite literally, the logical conclusion to "No one can consent to being choked." ACTUAL choke-holds, using perhaps 20x the pressure of a hand on the neck in bed, are a daily thing in 30k dojos.
12+% of women supported this^ position, in my latest poll. https://t.co/BTvP0Jt460
— Wilfred Reilly (@wil_da_beast630) November 6, 2026
We practiced escaping chokeholds in my krav maga class. This was not a fake or pretend chokehold. This training happens all over the world (and should).
And now I know how to break a chokehold, even if done to me by someone stronger and larger than I am. Fuck the leftist authoritarian prudes.
Even if I am forced to use it, if I cannot customize the OS or the browser it’s crap.
Using junk the normies use doesn’t work for me. I need power and control. Any anyone who tries to control me should be thrown out of the helicopter.
It’s disappointing how many people and places that should know better are viciously anti-AI, such as most of the commenters on Ars Technica.
They are little better than the Bluesky screechers. They seem to think if they keep repeating “plagiarism machine,” “fraud engine” (whatever the fuck that means), “slop” and related slogans they can turn back the tide. But of course, no, they will in fact not be able to reverse the progress of the most consequential computing technology in 40 years.
AI is here. It is not going anywhere. The choice is not to roll back the clock or not. News flash: the clock is not gonna roll back. It’s just not. It’s too late. To add even more clichés, the cat is out of the bag, Pandora’s box has been opened and the dogs have been let out. There is no reversing that. None, short of nuclear war and the collapse of civilization. Even if every major AI lab shut down tomorrow, capable open-weight models would still be sitting on hard drives and running on consumer GPUs all across the world.
So, what is their game? Virtue signaling and fear, mostly, I think. They have to demonstrate their virtuous “resistance” against a novel and unexpected thing that legitimately threatens many of their livelihoods. It’s all about mood affiliation. I don’t think 1 in 10 of them actually believe that AI is a “plagiarism machine” or that it is illegitimate in the ways they claim.
Their stances and approach means they will have no voice in the future, and will be rendered irrelevant. And that is just fine with me.
Distant benevolence is the mythical Canadian girlfriend of political virtue. https://t.co/zAcO20HshO
— Natasha Chart 🇺🇸 🇮🇱 🇺🇦 (@heterodoxan) November 4, 2026
Yes it is.
That’s correct. Safety, peace and calm is not the default state. It’s the hard-won exception.
And that has been forgotten by way too many.
I do not give a single fuck about Covid and never will again.
Inceldom makes people angry not because it’s wrong, or because sometimes one of the incels malfunctions and goes nuts, but rather because inceldom is largely correct about the dating market and its cruelty to most men.
Being right is one of the easiest ways to become despised.
I’ve noticed this too. I think it is just a performance for each other, to demonstrate that they are not engaging in dreaded thoughtcrimes.
It’s incredibly annoying, though.
A lot of women have decided they rather liked being treated like children and want to return to those times. And those women have (for now) a lot of power. It won’t last, though. The problem is that you can’t selectively choose when you’ll be treated like a child. Eventually, you will be acted on that way everywhere, and then your power will vanish like a summer vacation.
Men have been taught to deal with their immanent aggression and pugnaciousness, but it’s 100% verboten to help women learn to deal with their inherent greater neuroticism and intrasexual competition tendencies.
And it’s making them insane.
Women got the world they demanded…and didn’t even like it. LOL, FAFO.
However, this from Allie is wrong and fucking moronic. It’s not “debunked.” It just clear that she — like most extroverts — just does not understand introversion at all.
Why are extroverts always attempting to prove introverts don’t exist? Just why? I don’t care how much I like someone — after a few hours or at most days I just need to be alone.
Always have been that way, always will be. No, I am not socially anxious; I’m the least anxious person you’ll probably ever meet.
What the fuck is with this weird extrovert obsession with “proving” we aren’t real?
This is a good response to the bullshit Allie is claiming:
