Alone Time

Russell Brand, Rape, And โ€œNot All Men.โ€

Oh, Jesus Christ, this is stupid. I’ve read that moronic study the article references, the one that supposedly shows that 95.1% of men have used a “coercive strategy” to convince a woman to have sex. It has so many errors it could’ve been authored by Jason Arday.

My friends, some of those so-called coercive strategies the study cites include hanging out in a friend group, wanting to be alone where you can talk more easily, and hanging out somewhere private. In other words, getting introduced through friends, making her comfortable, and wanting to be alone with her. No, Iโ€™m literally not making that up. And in the paper itโ€™s even stupider, if you can imagine that. The “private place” item in the study actally reads โ€œsomewhere private and under your control,โ€ because apparently your apartment is a torture dungeon1.

None of that is coercion. It’s nowhere even near coercion! If it were every single woman I’ve ever slept with in my entire life would have been turbo-raping me. Which is fucking ridiculous. Anyone who can believe this casuistry is engaged in some weirdo political project, not attempting to help women or anyone else.

Again, I cannot stress enough how wanting to talk with someone alone is not coercive and is not tantamount to rape.

This sort of clown-ass mendacious perseveration by “progressives” is why no one takes them seriously. Everyone with a billionth of a brain knows that wanting to be alone with your paramour or the person you fancy is not rape. Everyone who is not a talentless horse-fucker understands that the best way to meet someone is to be introduced by friends.

This entire article, the study itself and anyone who gives any credence to any of it are all vile pieces of shit. I cannot express in words how despicably evil that study and those who cite it are.

  1. This study is really just an example of anti-male and anti-sexuality radical feminism.

Romance Disfluency

No one should have a pass to “go crazy.” This is what I mean by (some) women and romantic disappointment.

Anyway, my “go crazy” is throwing people out of helicopters over Somalia. And no one wants that1.

  1. I want that.

Breaking Changes

Modern women’s (mostly) quest to make romantic heartbreak illegal is absolutely insane to a level I had not previously contemplated.

Need a Lot of Helis

Also, it really pisses me off to an extreme level that we need permission like the below to use our own machines.

Everyone who had or has anything to do with that is definitely being thrown out of a helicopter over Somalia.

Teardown

(2) Ben Podgursky on X: "Very true. If FDR was president today he would build hyperscale datacenters on western BLM land. The Civilian Superintelligence Corps would be building transmission lines. The TVA would be a vast nuclear buildout." / X

That’s because modern “progressives” are against progress. They want things to decline and worsen. That is their entire modus operandi in politics and in life. They don’t want to build anything; in fact, they want to tear it all down.

Our first priority now is resisting these evil degrowthers.

Rubens and Snyders

Fuck all y'all

These days, I hate “progressives” and degrowthers so very much. They are a curse, and a scourge.

Although I do not agree with some of the methods of those tech bros, this whole excremental utterance is emblematic of the entire superstructure of faux-progressive thought: smarmy self-assurance combined with unfathomable ignorance of history, science, philosophy, and the long-held dreams of human striving; the desire to defeat aging and death is woven into the fabric of our earliest known stories. Gilgamesh dives to the bottom of the sea for the plant that restores youth, only to lose it to a snake. Selene begs eternal youth for Endymion. Alchemists for hundreds of years strove in vain for it. Francis Bacon himself made the prolongation of life an explicit program for natural philosophy. Condorcet, hiding from the Terror and months from his own death, wrote that the human lifespan might one day extend without any definable limit. This is what people — rightly — have dreamed of for literal ages.

That was progressivism once: the conviction that nothing about the human condition is fixed, not even death. By the way, early econ bro Tommy Malthus wrote his Essay on Population specifically to rebut Condorcet (and Godwin). Thus, todayโ€™s degrowthers are Malthusโ€™s heirs, all while calling themselves by the name of the very people he was arguing against.

But of course that is not the real issue here, though their disavowal alone of a very human instinct is itself deeply vile. It is rather that their answer to any form of striving is to amputate it before it can get a start, all the while smirking at their own (false) cleverness. Too much energy? Use less. Too much ambition? Desire less. Too much joie de vivre? Here’s a knife. The castration quip, thus, is not accidental. It is their entire horrid, despicable creed in miniature: vitality and ambition to achieve more are treated as a pathology. Enforced and artificial decline is treated as virtue. Though they’d claim to be faultless even as they cause it, they revel in the smug pleasure of watching someone else be humbled. Tall Poppy Syndrome is how they live and is the deepest core of their ethos. They want the worst for all of us as long as they can make fun of you in the shared pig sty.

They don’t want anyone to strive for the Moon, for the stars, for life eternal. Instead, they want to compete with the vulture and geld Prometheus.

Clearly

Exactly. The hilarious part is most of these dipshits have not listened to the cockpit audio. I did, and loud, so I could attempt to hear what was happening to the aircraft itself.

And the pilot actually flying the plane (if Nathalia was on the radios, she was probably not the active pilot) was reciting the Lord’s Prayer while Nathalia was communicating competently and professionally with ATC about their exact situation even though she knew she was heading toward certain death.

Again, Jeff Gregory, the pilot flying at the time was reciting the Lord’s Prayer while the plane was in peril. You can hear it clearly in the recording.

Heli of a Time

Even if I am forced to use it, if I cannot customize the OS or the browser it’s crap.

Using junk the normies use doesn’t work for me. I need power and control. Any anyone who tries to control me should be thrown out of the helicopter.

Outfitted

(2) Wilfred Reilly (@wil_da_beast630) / X

Those UK laws are insane. But the left has gone extremely prudish and very authoritarian — in many ways, more than the right ever was. A lot of the left’s views can be explained by female intrasexual competition, though (including the above). Or, in other words and pictures:

The Fant

(2) Rob Henderson on X: "Years ago Jordan Peterson offered a psychoanalytic reading that Western womenโ€™s unconscious appetite for masculine authority finds a safe outlet in enthusiasm for immigration from the Muslim world." / X

Because it feels anti-Western to them and because Islam also seems to them unequivocal, which is appealing as compared to being reared in the wishy-washy mushiness of Western late pseudo-liberalism. And many of those women have fantasies of being forcibly taken by some unrelenting Muslim man1 . I know it makes no sense, but fantasies often do not.

  1. Rape fantasies are extremely common in women.