Another reason

Another reason for the aliens to kill us all.

I estimate that I was left alone in cars for 100-200 hours before the age of 10. Maybe more. Itโ€™s not like I counted.

No car seats then, so my parents would say, โ€œIf you get hot, get out of the car and walk around.โ€

And Iโ€™d say, โ€œOK.โ€

And that was that. When you treat everyone like a dumbass, hereโ€™s what you end up with: dumbasses.

Grits

When I was very young and heard the song โ€œPuttinโ€™ on the Ritz,โ€ I thought it was saying โ€œSittinโ€™ on the Grits.โ€

Because at the time I had no idea what โ€œritzโ€ was or why youโ€™d put it on, but I did know what โ€œgritsโ€ were and obviously sitting on them wouldnโ€™t be that good of an idea.

Gunning it

Among the clinically insane, the โ€œopen carryโ€ people are some of the worst.

The normal, responsible gun owner who enjoys sport shooting but keeps their gun locked away responsibly and knows you donโ€™t need a mini-arsenal to enjoy guns is a dying breed. However, the development of the paranoid, highly insecure right winger who feels this pressing needs to โ€œproveโ€ the manliness he is secretly worried he doesnโ€™t have is? Now thatโ€™s a gold mine.

Fun fact: Iโ€™d be more effective with a single shot bolt action rifle from 300 meters than most of them would be with a spray-on-command semi-auto from 100 feet.

Because they donโ€™t actually care about shooting or marksmanship. They care about demonstrating โ€“ ineffectively โ€“ their masculinity.

Soc

Itโ€™s hard to think of anything I care about less or find more boring than soccer (football).

Maybe bingo. But they seem awfully similar to me. Both are a bunch of people in a confined space doing nothing for a long time.

Econned

You know your profession is a complete shitshow when you use math to attempt to disprove something that is obviously occurring.

Unfortunately, all of the focus on Piketty is a net negative because if conservatives and neoliberals manage to convince everyone that Piketty is wrong (which is likely; they own nearly all the media), then that will be in most peopleโ€™s minds a de facto refutation of the actuality of the startling increase in inequality.

So when โ€œeconomistsโ€ disprove using poor math something that is completely obvious, I wonder how anyone in that field is allowed even to speak. Because inequality is obviously rising โ€“ every statistic shows this โ€“ the question is only the mechanism.

One of the reasons I have problems with much of mathematical modeling is that in most fields itโ€™s just as social as anything else: in other words, it is almost always used to justify existing prejudices and the status quo, not to discover anything.