What no one ever suggests when debates like this come up โ at least no one in a serious policy position โ is that we should be working to reduce the human population.
The Left is of course and as usual full of cowards on this.
As a commenter points out reducing the human population to two billion would not exactly solve these problems but would make them much, much easier to work on.
I suspect the maximum long-term sustainable human population of the planet assuming any decent standard of living is ~500 million or so, but technology could probably improve that a bit.
Anyway, the best suggestion isnโt even mentionable in polite society. This and other reasons is why humanity long-term is doomed.
The Left would rather have us all huddling in tents starving to death at a population of 12
billion rather than to tell or to force people to stop dispensing kids into the world like Pez, and the Right is no better. Actually, they are worse, because they only want white women to procreate.
Paul Ehrlich will turn out to be right, just right a little too early.
A population of 5 billion people on this planet is unsustainable, much less 11 or 12. Itโs only wishful thinking to believe anything else.
I donโt do wishful thinking.
But I am glad Iโll be dead by 2070 or so. After that time, things on this planet are going to get really desperate.
That people who have kids arenโt putting every ounce of effort into fighting the future sort of mystifies me, though.