I try to avoid writing about politics on this site because in the US it is mostly irrelevant. The moneyed class will get what they want the hard way (Republicans) or the easy way (Democrats), and there is only difference on the margins between those two.

But this guy, though I disagree with a lot of what he says, is on the right track: Hilary Clinton would be a continuation of the Obama presidency, which was a continuation and in many ways an intensification of the Bush presidency.

Politically Obama and Bush didn’t govern that differently, all the heart-rending cries from dumbass self-deluded liberals aside.

I don’t support Hillary Clinton for president because I don’t support any war-mongering, high-finance-coddling, poverty-inducing colonialist assbag for president, regardless of gender or experience.

By the way, yeah, the Republicans took the Senate. So what. Know how much difference that’s going to make despite all the howling you’ve heard?

Absolutely none. American politics and outcomes – especially on the national level – is largely not influenced by voting, despite what you’ve read.

That’s a lie you’ve been sold.

But don’t believe me. Believe instead the evidence.