System D-tritus

For my next certification, Iโ€™m getting the Red Hat Certified Engineer.redhat

Since I donโ€™t routinely work in the Red Hat world unlike the other exams I took, it is going to take a lot more studying and time than it did for the others. Donโ€™t get me wrong,ย  Iโ€™ve used Linux and even RHEL, Fedora and other Red Hat-derived Linuxes over the years, but only rarely have I used it at work.

Iโ€™ve thus been learning about the latest Linux technologies, and especially systemd.

Jesus Christ, what a fucking mess.

These ignoramuses โ€“ typical of modern developers and UX/UI people โ€“ have destroyed all usefulness, all sense and just made a worthless system for little gain other than the things they are interested in.

Systemd, in other words, is terrible.

Itโ€™s vastly more complicated and fiddly to do everything. Itโ€™s a nightmare to configure a runlevel, itโ€™s difficult to add a new service, and in general itโ€™s just insecure. It is awesomely terrible and utterly foul. Only (as Iโ€™ve started to call them lately) a typical tech โ€œgenius moronโ€ could have come up with something so cretinous.

Typical developer arrogance, in other words.

It kind of reminds me of Microsoftโ€™s PowerShell philosophy, which seems to be, โ€œWhy do in 50 characters what you could do in 500 characters?โ€

The Debian maintainer of systemd recently resigned from the systemd project because he was getting death threats. While I obviously donโ€™t condone death threats, I must admit that learning about systemd sent me into a blind rage of fury at such abysmal technology being grafted into Linux.

While I can learn systemd just like I did PowerShell, itโ€™s an awful trade-off that makes Linux less Linux-like and will end up wasting millions and millions of developer and system admin person-hours on its utter crappiness.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *