The problem is that when people write about cultural appropriation, they almost always know
nothing about history, or culture.
Letโs look at the symbol of the raised fist.
Oh, wait.
The human hand has been used in art from the very beginnings, starting with stunning examples in Neolithic cave paintings. Early examples of the fist in graphic art can be found at least as far back as 1917 [1], with another example from Mexico in 1948 [2]. Fist images, in some form, were used in numerous political graphic genres, including the French and Soviet revolutions, the United States Communist Party, and the Black Panther Party for Self-defense.
1917. Pretty sure there were no Black Panthers in 1917.
To me, the raised fist means โsocialismโ because thatโs where Iโve seen it used most in my readings and meanderings through history. The Black Panther party adopted it โwait, I mean appropriated it โ from this source.
It was actually popularized during the Spanish Civil War in the 1930s and was used very widely after that all over the world. There is also some evidence that the “raised fist” might have been used in something similar to its current context as early as Assyria.
The feminist version of the raised first salute was first used in the 1969 protest of the Miss America pageant.
Whatโs weird about all the crying about cultural appropriation is that how little so many people who jump up on their soapbox and jabber about it know about culture or history.
Iโm of the opinion that if you think you are in the position of telling other people what to do, you should know something about it first.
But hey, thatโs just me.