High levels of immigration and strong social welfare policies are incompatible.

There is almost certainly no possible modern configuration of human nature that will allow both to co-exist for long.

This is one of the reasons elites support high levels of immigration — to eviscerate state social welfare support in service of furthering neoliberal goals.

Think Germany in the past few years. And of course the UK. Now we’re seeing the consequences phase.

Best sentence I’ve read so far about Brexit:

It is simplistic, although it will nevertheless be a popular stance among the elites, to depict the Leave vote as yet another proof that technocrats should be in charge. In fact, the very reason that so many UK citizens rejected the dire warnings of what was in store for them if they dared press the red Leave button was that those experts devised and implemented the neoliberal policies that have increased inequality, reduced their economic stability and accelerated political and social change.

That’s why it succeeded. People only demonize immigrants under two conditions, one more important than the other:

1) When their lives are getting worse while they observe a small sub-section of the population lead lives that get extraordinarily more lavish at their expense. (This is the most important reason.)

2) When immigrants actually move in, re-arrange communities, and occupy jobs that previously would’ve gone to those native to the area.

If people’s lives are improving, no one much cares about immigration. Number two then doesn’t matter.

But right now in the US, in the UK and in many other countries there is an absolute decline in standard of living and even lifespan for many combined with overwhelming immigration, all the while the working class is being told that they are unnecessary, and also being lectured that in the US that NAFTA helped them (somehow) — all while they watch their children succumb to meth, opioids and despair.

The EU and the rich are going to now heavily punish the UK, though. Which will only increase these anti-globalization sentiments by the way.

I’m not a UK citizen, so I have no say.

But I probably would’ve voted to leave the EU.

That said, on balance being in the EU is probably better for the rich and some of the upper-ish middle class than not. But being yoked to the EU is likely harmful to anyone making less than £40,000 or so.

I think it will actually hurt most of the UK to leave the EU. But it’ll hurt the oligarchs more, and that’s what I care about.

War — caused by climate change, immigration and the aftershocks of colonialism — is inevitable again in Europe. No one sees it, but it’s coming. In the larger and longer game, Brexit might help the UK survive that a bit better.

For now, though, expect to hear a lot of rich people crying. And that’ll be like music to my ears.

Gah, such a bizarre dream earlier.

1) Was plotting to assassinate the CEO of MERS.

2) A crazy woman with scarlet hair had some sort of gun from the future which didn’t fire bullets but rather beliefs. And the particular certainty that she was firing into a throng of people is the unshakeable and absolute conviction that the person hit is the vice president of the United States.

3) She also had a robot that was driving around erratically and screaming about “You weren’t supposed to fire that gun!” It seemed very appalled by her actions.

4) What the hell.

I was going to write something longer about immigration, but I just don’t have time.

But wanted to point out that it isn’t xenophobia to not want neoliberal policies to be inflicted on your community by way of millions of immigrants being imported either to purposely destabilize society (crisis capitalism by way of immigration as in Germany) or to lower the prevalent wages of the working class.

Economists say this doesn’t happen. However, economists can’t be trusted at all and from the data I’ve examined closely there’s some very fancy shuffling of numbers around to conceal what’s really happening. (For instance, as the rich get richer the average wage rises despite millions more not having jobs at all.)

Neolib forces have very cleverly appropriated the language of the left (xenophobia, racism) to battle against the very natural urge people have no to be made redundant, homeless and worthless to society when desperate immigrants arrive by the millions only to engage in a Tennysonian “red in tooth and claw” competition for low-wage helotry.

And the left has fallen for it completely by equating any opposition at all to anything except wide open borders as racism. In their eyes, if you actually desire your children to not be destitute and unemployed, you are irredeemably racist and bad.

Even after being out of the army for over 15 years, I sometimes still have dreams in which I lose my beret.

Strange. Because I never lost my beret while I was in the army. Nor was I really worried about it.

Though a woman I worked with got really sick on a helicopter flight one time and upchucked in someone else’s beret.

I wish I still had mine. An ex-girlfriend threw it away. She also tossed an artillery shell (the empty brass, anyway) that I’d been given. One that I personally fired. It was huge.

Should’ve broken up with her much, much earlier than I did. She was one of those who wanted to “fix” me. I’m not broken, just weird. At the end, she defined “fixing” me as throwing away or destroying anything that mattered to me.

Amazing the things people do. But I don’t dream about her; I dream about my beret.

This is a chart my amazingly talented partner put together that shows the S&P 500 inflation-adjusted index vs. PE ratio.

Look at that PE spike during the Great Recession. Conventional wisdom would tell you not to buy then. (That’s when we bought.)

This is valuable because how often you see major indices not inflation-adjusted.

Obviously age discrimination is de facto policy at many companies.

And it’s to save money, of course — but I wonder if there isn’t another factor contributing?

HR is if you haven’t noticed usually filled with very young people, typically right out of college (Usually young women, but that doesn’t really matter I don’t think.)

Just an idea. No clue if it has any explanatory power, but I wonder how much age discrimination is just a fait accompli of a bunch of 23-year-olds who see anyone 40 and above as unbelievably, inconceivably ancient?

I’d be willing to wager that has something to do with it.

A test would be to see what sort of job ads are produced by HR departments that skew much older than average, and compare those to ads produced by departments that skew younger.

I suspect there’d be a difference.

Have you ever seen anyone naked on the internet that you know or knew in real life? That you had no intention to, just in the course of internet events?

I have, once. No, I’m not telling you who. That would be unethical.

But it was a little surprising, especially since I hadn’t really thought of her that way (you know — naked) before.

Turns out she had a very nice bum.

I did what any person who is not a complete jerk would do — I said “huh” and never mentioned it to her and treated her just the same as before. The photos didn’t seem to be stolen/revenge type photos so really nothing else to do.

Today, I am sick and yesterday I fell down the stairs.

This week is starting off great!

For the first time in history a woman — Virginia Raggi — will be the mayor of Rome. And here is how NBCnews.com chose to let us know that:

Think a man would’ve gotten that same headline? Yes, part of her reasons for standing for mayor were issues related to how it’s difficult being a mother in a city with decaying infrastructure (sound like anywhere else you know?).

If it were a man though, no matter what had spurred his political awakening the headline would’ve read something more like: “Lawyer Vows to Clean Up Infrastructure Woes in the Eternal City” or something of that nature.

This frames poor city services and a decaying societal framework as the concern of women — and that’s not the first time I’ve seen such equivalence. I guess Real Men just make do. No bridge? Just toss a rope across and brachiate. What are you, weak? Some kind of sissy?

Expect to see more of that sort of rhetoric as the US further declines.

Americans spend an absurd amount of time and effort on lawn and yard maintenance.

One guy who lives near us mows his lawn every day, or nearly so. The lawn mower is a constant annoyance.

Do people really have nothing better to do?

Reading history like this and observing my own workplaces, I’ve been completely disabused of the notion that most of the indignities and petty crimes committed against workers have anything at all to do with increasing or maintaining profits.

I think profit concerns are at the bottom of the list in most cases for the managerial class.

Power relations better explain what’s happening in the linked story and in modern office environments.

Open office plans harm productivity and thus profit. How to explain them, then? Power. The managerial MBA class wants to exert power over those they’ve “worked hard” to be better than. They want to feel like a manor lord watching from a high casement while the peasants toil below.

Most companies being against people working from home, even a day or two a week? Power again.

Most of the harms that companies seem determined to inflict on their staff actually harm productivity and profit. But the people who tend to be in charge of such organizations don’t get placed in those positions because they are motivated by money, for the most part. No, they are motivated by wishing to be atop the hierarchy. Therefore ceding any power to those they deem lesser than they are — such as someone having their own office or working from home — invests that power in the worker and denies it to the manager.

I agree that this makes no sense but because all that the managerial types understand are zero sum games, by their logic individual offices and other proven productivity enhancers subtract from their own power.

Where I currently work, I think I could pretty easily increase profits by 10-15% with no net job reduction. But these ideas would definitely reduce the power of management to control worker’s lives and would increase worker satisfaction immensely (while reducing hours somewhat), so it will never happen.

People who say that AI or fusion is impossible because we haven’t managed to do it yet after 50 or 60 years of trying — well, they are very ignorant of history.

A nearly two thousand year span separates the construction of the first primitive steam engines from the first industrial use.

Also the same vast span of time separates geometry and algebra from the concepts of analytic geometry.

There are dozens of examples if one cares to look.

Because something doesn’t happen the moment someone thinks it might be possible means nothing. For AI and fusion, I wouldn’t be surprised if they take one or two thousands years. I don’t expect that, but I wouldn’t be surprised.

That’s how history has moved in the past, after all.

Another way humans are maladapted to our current civilization is that we have a primal revulsion and disgust reaction to and against the desperate. Any form of desperation — it matters not.

When resources were scarce, this made sense. Nothing to share. No time nor ability to take care of someone who will be a drain while living on the edge of survival (emotional or physical).

But now, that reaction actually harms the entire society since we’re all so tightly enmeshed.