Fense

Self-defense training works.

Most attackers have no training and are looking for easy victims, not for anyone who fights back. Resist effectively and you will prevail, even if you are smaller.

At that point, Herron had already gone public with the story of her harrowing run, telling ABC News that she used her self-defense training to defeat the attacker by scratching his face, โ€œhitting the side of his head,โ€ and ultimately locking him inside with a carabiner until police arrived.

If you are fighting someone who is both well-trained and determined to harm you in specific, you are probably doomed no matter how large or well-trained you are. But that is maybe 0.01% or fewer of attacks. Most are just opportunistic ambushes like the one Herron experienced.

You’d be just amazed how quickly someone lets you go when you poke both thumbs in their eyeballs as hard as you can.

It’s not advertised anywhere but I know this from Krav Maga classes: the best thing they teach you is to get over your natural aversion to truly fucking someone up by using tactics like I mentioned above. The good ones aren’t (mostly) going to teach you crazy kung fu garbage that is actually worthless in a real fight, but rather the above.

That is where their value lies.

Foxing

Another thing I am 99.99% sure scientists are incorrect about is on the insistence that Fox News et al. has not had any effect on people’s attitudes and political views.

Literally everyone I’ve ever talked to has had an older (usually) parent or relative or friend who was relatively normal during the 1980s and 1990s, found Rush Limbaugh and Fox News, and then went completely paranoiac, deranged, and delusional. Just like this person.

The other day, I was talking to someone at work about how he never discussed politics with his parents anymore because after they started watching Fox News in the late 1990s they went politically nutso.

My grandfather (who was always a Republican, but a fairly liberal Republican) did the same thing.

It’s harder to find people who haven’t experienced someone who has undergone this lunacy transition than the opposite.

Why I don’t trust experts, part million.

AHCA

It would’ve been nice if the Democrats had subjected the also-terrible ACA to the same scrutiny that the Republican health care “plan” is receiving.

Yes, yes, the AHCA is worse. Far worse. But pretending as Dems now seem to that the ACA was some magical achievement that solved all our problems is very disingenuous and counter to reality.

Both are terrible, giveaways and handouts to the already rich, just the Republican plan is actively designed to be malicious and not to help people, while if Obama’s ACA incidentally helped anyone, that was ok, as long as the health insurance industry was protected and the right pockets got greased.

Tern tern tern

One of the young (20?) interns at work was completely surprised that I know who Sylvan Esso is, and that I listen to a lot of EDM and electro-pop, including some that she’d never heard of.

Most people die before they get old. I’d prefer the opposite.

On a related note, there’s a group of older people in my office who nearly every day talk about how great the Rolling Stones or Yes! or some bands from the 1980s were and how all music is terrible now — and if I have to listen to that litany of despair and surrender again, I think I will blast out some Rameses B from my computer.

Surveil

I never thought I’d live in a world where people gleefully subject themselves to surveillance and control technologies like Facebook and this garbage.

Sure, I will put Alexa in my home — a device that literally listens to all my conversations and sends them to who knows where.

That sounds like a great idea. Sign me up. Really avoids inconveniencing the NSA, FBI, etc. Instead of bothering to bug my domicile, I pay all the costs. It’s laissez-faire snooping. Ah, the glories of market-based solutions.

If you’d told me Trump would be president when I was a kid — ok, sounds weird, but maybe.

If you’d told me that people would willingly subject themselves to Facebook’s program of surveillance and manipulation, and would voluntarily pay to place bugging devices in their homes and would also carry tracking devices in their pockets at all times — I would’ve thought you to be absolutely raving mad and would’ve laughed at you.

But here we are.

Bucks

I helped close a $1.2 million sale at work in the past few days. Doing technical sales isn’t really something I want to pursue as a vocation, but turns out I am pretty decent at it.

Those sales pay my salary, so interesting to see it and do it from the front lines.

White gloves

We’ve been having a problem lately at work with very expensive hardware arriving non-functional. This hardware runs $50,000 or $60,000 each — not cheap. It’s not clear if it’s the shipping company or the hardware reseller causing the problems — or perhaps both.

Lately, the reseller has been giving the hardware the “white glove” treatment (they claim) as they handle it.

Even with this, another $60,000 box arrived in a non-working state today.

On an internal call discussing it, someone said that damage occurred even with the vendor’s white glove treatment.

And I said, “Yeah, but it was a boxing glove.”

No one laughed! And it was funny! It was a good quip!

So now I recount it here so at least someone can laugh, somewhere.

Not so ex

I’m not so exorcised over the supposed end of democracy in this country caused by Trumpism because democracy had already ended a long while ago de facto.

Most objections to Trump stem from that he’s louche and uncouth and visibly unprincipled rather than any specific actions.

If this were not the case, pseudo-liberals would have been just as strenuously and vociferously objecting to many Obama actions that merited in their view nary a response.

We already lived in a neo-fascist pretend democracy. Trump just put an orange pouty face on it.

Gladly

I know it’s not on offer, but if it were, I’d gladly cut my pay in half for universal health care, a $20 minimum wage, real unions having a say again, and UBI.

I know, I know: fairies and unicorns and princesses.

But the thing is, the 40-hour-work week, a minimum wage and Social Security all were at one time also fairies and unicorns and princesses.

Don’t believe that, read some goddamn history for once.

Pharma

This reminds me of a bad experience I had with a pharmacist.

I was there filling a prescription for someone else. From the moment I showed up to get a prescription filled, the pharmacist was an arrogant dismissive prick. That I could let slide. It’s just how many people are.

But when I handed him my ID, that’s when things went south. He said, “This is a military ID. And you’re not in the military. I should confiscate this from you. In fact I think I just won’t give it back.” I was in the military, actually, but had just returned from a deployment where my hair was longer and I looked more unkempt than usual. How he thought pharmacists had the authority to confiscate anything from anyone remains a complete mystery to me.

He wasn’t joking, though. As I mentioned above: arrogant dismissive prick.

I said calmly, almost cheerily, “You’d be surprised how fast I can jump this counter and make you regret that course of action.”

He waited a moment to see if I would flinch or walk my statement back. I just stared at him. The moment passed and then he realized nothing good was going to occur. There’s a particular look that bullies get when they realize they are in over their heads. I’ve seen it many times. It’s confusion, fear and resentful anger all mixed up together. I saw it on the pharmacist’s face as he handed me back my ID.

“I was just joking,” he said. They usually say that.

“I wasn’t,” I replied. “Now either fill my prescription or not. I don’t care.”

He filled my prescription and didn’t say another word to me. Never went back there again, though.

Are all pharmacists such dickheads? All the ones I’ve met have been — but that was the worst I’ve ever experienced.

Why I don’t trust anyone, experts included

So much that people have told me didn’t matter at all has turned out to matter incredibly much over the years. These are all concerns that I’ve brought up in places and was either outright banned, dismissed, or laughed at for attempting to discuss:

1) Ownership of information — DRM, copyright, and related topics. Roundly told it was just a “nerd distraction” from the “real issues.” Turns out it will be an epoch-defining issue for this century.

2) Inequality and wealth consolidation. Was told by both Dems and Repubs during the late 90s and through the oughts that this was irrelevant, unchangeable, a “natural feature” of capitalism and most people didn’t care about it. Probably led to the election of Trump and more importantly worsening lives for millions.

3) More than a year before the election, noticed that Hillary Clinton was the most disliked major candidate ever (likely to be) nominated by the Democrats. Well, see above.

4) Was advocating focusing research on solar and renewables in the early 2000s. Was told that solar and renewables would never amount to anything, were technologically impossible, and were too expensive to ever use anywhere.

5) I’d long been worried about the fragility of the financial system. Was told that a meltdown of the stock markets and the financial system similar to the 1930s was completely impossible — we’d solved that. Then 2008 occurred.

There are many more reasons, but those five are some major reasons I don’t trust experts even if I do listen to them in an advisory capacity.

Too often, their input information is erroneous, their incentives skewed to pilfering your wallet, and their conclusions therefore tailored to doing just that.

Snake oil, DSGE, and moment matching

Economics is the most delusional pseudoscience.

It’s certainly not sociology nor psychology. Those are actual sciences, just not well-grounded ones in some areas and with more con artists than they should have.

I single out economics as the most delusional because it is the only one that not only has bogus conclusions but essentially as part of its very process fakes its own input data. This is not a matter of fraud (in the traditional sense) nor the lack of knowledge about how the real world works, but the fact there are immense incentives for economics to have both bogus front-end suppositions and back-end conclusions.

Thus the sclerotic state of economics as a profession today. We’d have a better time with charlatans, honestly. A charlatan at least knows she’s selling rubbish, while a true believer in economics realizes no such thing and all the more harm is caused therefrom.