Assuming medical immortality but that the rate of accidental death stays roughly the same, the average Western human lifespan would still only be around 1,000 years long.
And after 5,000 years, the large-cohort survival rate is only around 5%.
A thousand years ain’t bad, but nowhere near immortality.
I see so much stupid specious word detritus like this.
I find it troubling that virtually no one can say what Trump's campaign did well, but everyone can harp on Hillary's mistakes.
— GothamGirlBlue (@GothamGirlBlue) April 22, 2017
Trump ran a far better campaign than Clinton. He spent half the money and got better results. But want specifics? Ok. Here you go.
1) Media manipulation/leveraging. Trump’s campaign was a master at this. Clinton was by contrast (as usual) tone-deaf, condescendingly exhortative and polished (which doesn’t get any attention). Those damn deplorables….
2) Social media. Not much to say about this. Trump’s campaign made better use of this medium and reached far more people whose votes were actually contestable.
3) Messaging. This is a really big one. Should’ve listed it first, but who cares when you’re responding to people who care not a whit about reality and are kind of dumb to boot. Anyway, Trump’s messaging about the working class, about the negative effects of NAFTA, China trade, etc., were spot on. Clinton’s mush-mouthed flip-flopping (TPP) were the exact opposite. (Note this is separate from the likelihood of Trump now keeping any promises. I think he will not.)
4) Trump concentrated campaign funds very intelligently on areas and rallies where they were likely to make a difference (Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio, etc.). Clinton did not. Simple as that.
5) Trump’s other outreach efforts were also more effective, while Clinton’s were often extremely counterproductive.
That’s five. There are more. But this narrative that Clinton! Was the most qualified! Candidate! In the history of the universe EVER! Just has to die.
This is America, for better or worse. Our ethos is the proof that you deserve to win is that you won.
Who is president? Right. Not Clinton. The superiority of Trump’s campaign effort could glibly be described in just those few sentences.
See also this typical garbage by Lance Mannion.
The Democrats are spreading this ridiculous narrative wide and far, when really all they are conveying is how badly they want to lose in 2018 and 2020.
Linnell even proposes that employers, were they looking to design the best workforces, consider stationing employees who need to concentrate outside the city.
Immediate productivity increase for me of 50%, more likely double, if I were allowed to work from a well-connected place in the countryside, with birdsong and near a riverbank.
Companies, though, care about “efficiency” and not actual efficiency.
I don’t agree with a great deal of what Robert Prechter writes and believes, but this is indeed true.
Gilburt: With the advent and proliferation of computer-executed trading, what effect have they had on Elliott Wave analysis, other than the speed at which trading is done?
Prechter: Virtually none. People build their errors of thinking into their programs.
Algorithms reflect what everyone “knows.” Which is often all wrong. Like cows, they herd, and stampede at a loud noise. This might be true even sans humans composing them, but is definitely true with humans coding them up.