Whatโs weird about this one and most of those Photoshop jobs is that Olsen actually looks much, much worse in the photoshopped version. I thought the idea was to make people look more attractive? Olsen not only doesnโt look like herself, she looks gaunt and pinched, like she just tasted some really bad kimchi or something.
There was one magazine in the grocery store with Alicia Vikander on the cover. Sheโd been so photoshopped she was barely recognizable. Why would you do this to anyone, but particularly her? Sheโs already very beautiful with no makeup. Youโre not improving her by making her look any different because part of what is appealing about people is their particularity and even their flaws, not some android version of themselves (very appropriate for Vikander).
Elizabeth Olsen herself is kind of unusual looking, and thatโs part of what makes her interesting. Thatโs one of the reasons why she was picked to play the Scarlet Witch, after all. It doesnโt hurt that sheโs actually a pretty good actress, too.
(Hereโs another terrible photoshop job, this time with men.)