Denial of Reality

โ€œFox brainโ€ is a thing, and it has victims. I have many friends whose parents went from nice moderates to angry, fearful racists in a matter of months. Iโ€™m sure you do, too.

This is something that scientists say doesn’t happen, but of course nearly everyone alive knows at least one person this has happened to. I don’t know many people, and I know at least 8-9 that have undergone this transition from relatively-normal people to raving Fox loonies.

Why the insistence by all too many scientists that this doesn’t happen and can’t happen, I don’t know. But my own grandfather went from a relatively-liberal Republican (though with plenty of racism) to a raving, toxic conservative, largely due to Rush Limbaugh and Fox News.

It happens all the time; or, rather, happened — I believe the phenomenon has mostly played out. One of the reasons people distrust science is the denial of obvious reality that occurs all too often because it can’t be quantified very well, therefore it “doesn’t exist.”

Meating

Because a vegetarian diet’s health benefits are vastly overstated, and working out heavily on a purely plant-based diet is generally a bad idea. Also, when I eat mostly plants, my energy flags and my health suffers.

Not everyone is physiologically the same. Also, I like meat and won’t give it up unless it becomes illegal to eat. And even then, I probably still won’t.

Size

Since there is huge demand for small phones, yet manufacturers refuse to make them, what in the world is going on here? Is it just sexism?

I have no doubt that is part of the cause, but thinking about it more deeply I think that the larger explanation is that manufacturers are attempting to make sure that the phones are adequate enough to replace desktop machines and tablets such that even those who do want small phones will have no choice, and thus conclude that something with a monstrous screen is there already so they need not use a better device.

Again, why? One must ask. And the reason is that smartphones are the new nexus of tracking and control, much more efficient at it and capable than desktop machines or tablets, and much harder to remove these capabilities therefrom. It is imperative both to surveillance capitalism and to the surveillance state that people use smartphones almost exclusively. They are the modern lever of propagandistic control and monitoring.

Small smartphones that aren’t paid attention to often, that can easily be left behind, are inimical to these sweeping surveillance and control ambitions. That, then, is why despite enormous demand no small smartphones exist to be bought new nor are likely to be made again.

Cracking

Ok, I have a real crackpot physics theory now.

What if the many-worlds interpretation of QM is correct, but that the many worlds don’t require any physical existence because determinism is true, but unverifiably so? Meaning that the many worlds exist sort of like virtual particles that never instantiate because determinism means that only one world can actually exist.

Ok, now that’s a crackpot physics theory I can find no evidence anywhere of anyone cracking enough to produce such a pot!

Adulterated

I realized that nearly all adults were repositories of bad advice and lies when I was about 10, and then started doing what I wanted to do. My first experience of ignoring “experts!”

It caused me no end of trouble, but I was much happier once I started rejecting what I was supposed to do and concentrating on what would make me actually smarter and better.

Results and Seeing Them

Yep. You don’t have to work long to see results, but you do have to work hard. If you’re not lifting enough where at the end you are thinking, I can’t lift this anymore, you’re not doing much good.

Doing 10 minutes of low-rep, high-weight sets to failure is better than an hour of goofing around with low weight where you never feel anything.

Example: I work out a lot, but it’s not like I spend hours a day doing it. When I work out alone, I spend 30-60 minutes a day. Rarely longer than that. And in just a bit more than six months, I’ve gotten twice as strong, my endurance has increased dramatically, and I look and feel a lot better.

But that’s because every workout, I go hard and push myself. Otherwise, why waste the time?

Hanna

I do not care for the new Amazon series adaptation of the 2011 movie Hanna.

While the 2011 movie with Saoirse Ronan was excellent, this new version manages to miss every beat the movie hit with panache, and the actors are all much worse — with the exception of a chilling and understatedly fiendish Mireille Enos.

Nearly everything in the series is lukewarm or just plain senseless. I’ve never seen Esme Creed-Miles in any other work before, and a lot of times bad acting is really bad directorship, but she’s as passive as a frozen fish most of the time. Ronan’s Hanna could be cold and calculating, but she was also animated and sometimes-ebullient, excitable and passionate, while also full of doubt and fury. I am not sure exactly what the Creed-Miles’ Hanna is. She’s a cipher who reveals nothing, seems to want nothing (despite what her mouth says), and moons through the world making absurd mistakes that don’t make any sense when considering her training and capabilities. Yes, she’s a teenage girl, but the whole point of Hanna is that she’s just young, not a dunce. Ronan’s Hanna made errors due to her inexperience, but she never made dunce-level mistakes as Creed-Miles’ Hanna does constantly. It detracts from the work and it does not accord with the training she’s had or her innate capabilities. It seems inserted just to drive the plot when it could be driven so many other ways. Ronan’s Hanna was a pale-eyed Valkyrie who, though being a little scary, you could identify with, that if you were at all normal and met her in the real world, you’d empathize with her and want to help and protect her. The Hanna in the new series, though, who can tell what she wants or thinks because she never acts enough to even hazard a guess.

As I said, I don’t intend to attack Creed-Miles. In Star Wars, despite being a quite capable actor, Natalie Portman seemed as wooden as a redwood tree. Thus, I don’t know what the true story is here, and her performance is not nearly the only flaw of the series.

Examining it from a larger perspective, they’ve expanded a two hour movie into about seven hours of screen time without really adding anything at all of consequence. It seems there is more content present just to pad the series out rather than to allow us to deeply inhabit Hanna’s world. We could’ve learned what it’s like for a young girl to grow up in the woods, dozens of miles from anyone else, essentially alone, but we don’t. We could learn what caused Marissa Wiegler to become so diabolical and merciless, and to be such a hypocrite, but we don’t. Or if we do I haven’t seen it, because I could not yet make it all the way through the series due to my frustrations.

I don’t know if I’ll finish the series. Probably not. I am getting very little from it. Even the fight scenes aren’t well-choreographed, because even though Hanna is augmented and far stronger than a normal person, she’s not using techniques that would be particularly successful against those who mass much more than she does.

The series, as noted, has a lot of problems, not least of which is that you could watch the 2011 movie and get far more enjoyment and genuine thrills in far less time.

Photonic

And the people below would be the same damn ones showing you a sonogram and saying, “Look at this picture of the new baby” or some such shit as that — which I agree is a picture, as in depiction, but is by their definition far less of a picture because it doesn’t even make use of photons.

Never mind learning about photons, ya’ll have a lot more work to do before we start that lesson.