Slick Slack

Slack Wants to Replace Email. Is That What We Want?

Absolutely fucking not. Slack is like a phone call — people loading you with tasks you have to deal with immediately. My job is a cognitive one. I don’t need to be getting pings about every little thing constantly. That way leads to destroyed productivity and tons of wasted time.

Slack is a scam that causes people to get addicted to the immediate feedback. The company of course does not care about productivity at all — they care about people using Slack.

Avoid at all costs.

About Lib

About liberal hypocrisy re: Obama and in general, I don’t give a fuck that the other side is worse. I’m not on a goddamn team and this isn’t a football match. Obama was a monster and terrible person and leader and so is Trump. Obama made bad decisions that hurt the country, decisions that directly allowed Trump to win. Trump is a different kind of evil — exactly what kind remains to be seen. If he goes to war with Iran, then worse than Obama. If not, about the same.

The lesser evil bullshit ignores that you’re still choosing evil. That framing leads down some terrible, untenable paths.

Again, I’m not on a team and I won’t choose the lesser evil to avoid liberal tears. Cry all you want, delusional libs, some of us (more of us all the time) don’t keep score on your scoreboard.

Most US liberals are truly conservatives, anyway, but they just don’t have any antipathy to gay people. That’s not inconsequential but nothing new will be born out of their confused admixture of fantasy beliefs, especially with climate change barreling towards us.

Stop Frontin’, Back Up

I can answer this!

But first, most places are terrible at backups, and it’s (usually) not the fault of IT. It’s often lack of budget — leadership does not prioritize backup as it looks expensive on paper and isn’t needed often. But when it is needed, damn you really need it.

So let’s look at a small city like Riviera Beach. It’s got about 35,000 residents and probably around 350 city employees (full and part-time). That’s at least 400 workstations to back up. The workstations, though, aren’t that important comparatively. Still, we’ll include them.

It’s hard to know the exact IT infrastructure of a town — it varies too much. But we can make some guesses and generalizations. A small town will be keeping long-term records (usually in PDF or TIFF format), do GIS, HR, etc., and all the ancillary data to support that. Say it’s 50,000GB, total, just for the server systems. That’s 50 terabytes of data that would be vital to city. Again, that’s just a guess, but I bet I am not too far off (been working in IT a long time).

If their IT department is competent enough, they can build a 100TB NAS dedicated to backup for about $7,000. Use something like Veeam Backup and Replication to back up the vital server systems — that should enough to keep about 180 days worth of backups. Veeam would add about $10,000 in licensing to that cost.

There’s $17,000.

For long-term backups (usual dance of monthly/yearly/every seven years), you would need to go offsite, of course. Backblaze B2 storage is a good choice for this. A year of this for 50TB of data plus monthly increases would be about $3,050 a year.

The 400-ish workstations are a harder task, but also far less important. I wouldn’t consider backing up the entire workstation — too expensive what you get. I’d set a policy of only backing up user profiles, and only certain folders at that. That’d be about 10TB of user data also on our NAS, which should fit fine with de-dupe and compression. First, I’d put it on that aforementioned backup NAS and then I’d move it also into B2 storage, with a 180 day-retention period.

That’s another $640 a year.

So, let’s look at our backup costs:

Server/infra backup: $17,000.
Offsite long-term: $3,050
Workstation backup: $640
Labor/setup (est): $40,000 (assuming two employees take two months to set up all this and cost is $100 per hour. This is probably an overestimate because I could set this all up by myself in about two weeks)

Cost of decent backup, including labor: $60,690
Cost of paying hackers: $600,000
Savings from good backup: $539,310

As I noted, there a lot of assumptions and unknowns here. I can guarantee, though, that my costs and estimates aren’t that far off.

But How Do You Feel

Should we stop calling people ‘overweight’?

MPs think the terms have a negative impact on body image and self-esteem, and want doctors to promote broader health and lifestyle messages instead.

Sure, because we must be more concerned with self-esteem than health or having a foot rot off due to obesity-related diabetes at age 45. Makes total sense. If people cared more about improving their lives and their societies instead of getting their precious feelings hurt, the world would be a lot better off, and not just in this arena.

There is a difference between respect, discrimination, and treating people like fragile children. We should not do the latter.

Vanitah

Vanity exercising? What a numpty.

A very, very small percentage of people exercise for vanity. Most do it to feel better and be healthier. Sure, I don’t mind looking better, too. But I’m not Chris Hemsworth. I’m not going to be playing Thor any time soon in a Marvel flick. I mainly hit the weights so I’ll be healthier for long enough to spend more time with my partner and living in good health in general.

Exercising buys you time, not steals it. It’s about a 5 to 1 payback on average.

If this dude really cared about seeing his kids long-term, he’d be doing some “vanity exercising” in the gym. Again, what a numpty.

Speechify

Puerile objections that, “Wah, Facebook censoring isn’t real censorship because the government didn’t do it!” ignore that the state has essentially ceded regulatory powers and public space to a cabal of large corporations, Facebook and Twitter among them, and this alters the parameters of our social contract greatly.

Shallow glosses of large systemic changes are all that most people seem capable of now; the world has shifted but all most can see is the after-image of the antediluvian relic imprinted on their retinas. This is changing, but too slowly — the old has already departed but the shape of the new can’t yet be credited to a viable reality by most people.

I would recommend some books to read, but those won’t help. If people wanted to get smarter, they would. It’s not that hard. As with Bernie Sanders and his campaign, most are describing a bygone past that has no chance of restoration, but oh they yearn for it because it is understood, at least illusorily. It had been quantified and the homilies about it sounded like truth. But those bromides no longer work and read as ridiculous with even a moment’s thought, yet still they attempt to apply them. But those spells don’t work, don’t cohere, and it makes these people dismissive and angry as the obsolete world is already long under the waves and the new creation, risen all around them, is invisible and inaudible to them yet controls their lives utterly.