ATW

I hear you. That and “Sarah” by Kate Miller-Heidke are the best-written songs of the past decade, easily. I almost wish Swift had never composed “All Too Well” because of how shoddy it makes other songs look by comparison.

What’s particularly notable about the song is how she was able to universalize the feelings she’s discussing while not making the references clichรฉ enough to by cloying or on the other hand too specific to be meaningful to anyone — now that is genius and is absurdly difficult to do. What’s even more amazing about the work is that not only is Swift citing specific incidents that sound like they really happened to her (Did they really? Who cares.) while also calling out archetypal memories and cultural touchstones — Jesus Christ, when I think about it I am in awe of her achievement.

Notelling

Do people not realize when you see a PR photo or movie with some actor looking really buff, those shots are generally taken under these conditions (even assuming they’re not photoshopped):

  • They are generally very dehydrated. An easy way to improve muscle definition is to not drink enough water the day or two before and to do things to intentionally dehydrate yourself.
  • They have generally just worked out. This fills the muscles with blood and makes them look much larger and more defined.
  • They probably fasted the week before. See above for the results.
  • They are in favorable lighting. This matters a lot — far, far more than most people realize who’ve never photographed models.
  • They are flexing. Flexing makes your muscles look much larger and is easy to do without it being obvious.

This is what I was reacting to, by the way. Here, Momoa is doing none of those things, so he looks fairly normal from a muscularity perspective:

I am muscular enough now that I could look pretty shredded if I did all the things above, but doing so is inimical to actually continuing to gain muscle, which is what I care about.

Wondering why men have increasing issues with body image? See that moronic Twitter thread for why.

Assortative

When I say that modern liberals believe people should only meet by inhuman algorithmic match, I know a lot of you think that’s absurd. But they really do believe that:

Sounds like a great world to me. Ok, not. Control sexuality and you control the world. I think libs understand this just fine but don’t want to believe they understand it, because that would be ceding too much power to biology — so this is their way to assert control over biology while pretending to have other, more noble interests at heart. This self-deception is necessary to preserve self-image and for proper assortative mating to be enforced, which is also something liberals pretend to not care about but do even more so than conservatives.

FA Dissociation

Something odd I’ve noticed about the Fat Acceptance movement is that most of them talk about their bodies as completely separate from the rest of their being. They always say odd things like, “It feels good to my body” or “This body is strong” and similar phrasings. It’s like they don’t even associate their bodies with themselves.

I wonder if that is not part of the problem, this dissociation? It’s just a very bizarre way of speaking that I noticed. I don’t have any firm conclusions about it but it seems like a clue to something.

I Hered It Through The Grapevine

I’d forgotten she was in The Sixth Sense. Will have to watch that again just for Collette.

But, yes, unfortunately for horror-haters the best movie performance of 2018 was Toni Collette in Hereditary. No others I saw were even that close. Sarah Paulson in Bird Box doesn’t really count because she was only in the film for five minutes or so.

Perot

Ross Perot was right:

I know economists — useless wankers — will blather on about net benefits, but net benefits don’t fucking matter if you disenfranchise and destroy a large part of the middle class in the process.

No, I don’t think Perot would’ve been a good president, but he was right about NAFTA and similar.

Transhuman

I don’t think the transhumanists and singularitians are wrong, exactly. Mainly their timescale is. They believe their envisioned post-human reverie will arrive in a generation or two while I think it’ll be 5,000 to possibly even a million years hence.

Assuming humans survive that long at all, which right now I’d put at about 10%.

So in a way, I don’t believe in that future at all, because I doubt we’ll survive in any form.

But if we do survive, then I think it’s nearly-inevitable that we’ll change ourselves in now nigh-unimaginable ways, gain better control of matter and space, and expand out into the galaxy. Doesn’t violate the laws of physics and is within the realm of human understanding, so it’ll probably happen just as a random walk across complexity space.

A Usual Rant

The liberal utopia future: no meat, no AC (not really tenable for many, including me, no matter how good the buildings are), no travel, no amenities of modern life, basically living like 13th century peasants and all that entails. I am sure soon they will be coming for our refrigerators.

Fuck that. I think we can do better. We have to do better, because only a relatively-small percentage of people will voluntarily sign up for that. Then the planet burns because of lib purity BS.

People will absolutely choose fascism over that. And I understand that completely.

Pellet

Was reading this article about alerting domestic abuse survivors if their abuser attempts to buy a gun.

The gun in the article pictured is a CO2 pellet gun, not a firearm as such. Definitionally, firearms are weapons that produce their propulsive force chemically, not mechanically, thus this would be a type of air gun. Air guns would not be covered by such a method of background checking and alerting, so that weapon is not a good illustration for the piece, really.

I had a similar CO2 pistol as a kid that an uncle gave me, but I almost never used it because I couldn’t afford the CO2 cartridges for it.

Believe it is this one used in the article illustration.

Pie

I certainly might eat less meat if it’d help save the planet and it didn’t harm me or my fitness goals.

But I will not eat less meat to make some damn pseudo-hippie self-harming vegan feel religious vindication. That just makes me want to eat more meat. If that’s my version of rolling coal, so be it. At least I’ll be strong and healthy while doing so.