Why Boomers and Gen X Hate Bernie

I was a bit surprised how much vitriol the Boomers and Gen X (like Scalzi) actually possess towards Bernie Sanders, so I started thinking on why.

To be clear, I am not a strong Bernie supporter and have never voted for him and would’ve preferred he didn’t run in 2020. That said, there is an enormous dichotomy in how all the people below Gen X view Bernie and people like Scalzi and older feel about him. This emerges from a few trends of those generations, I think.

The first is that they are from a time where there was some reality but mostly the illusion of comity and bipartisanship between the parties. Tip O’Neill working together with the Democrats, Clinton and his collaboration with the Republicans to pass the execrable crime bills and welfare reform — in the Gen X/Boomer mind, these were halcyon days of bipartisan coalitions and happy alliances. The reality, of course, was much different but that’s how they perceive it.

To those two generations, however, Sanders destroys this felicitous fantasy of civility and decorum by opposing in the strongest terms the ideal and the actuality of bipartisanship. He resists conservative plans completely and won’t “cross the aisle” at all. For this, they hate him.

Leading into the second point quite naturally is the severe Boomer/Gen X nostalgia. This is perhaps — in the US at least — the most powerful force in politics. Many people yearn for a varnished and preserved version of the 1950s that they did not even live through, and people like Scalzi are even worse for they yearn for yearning for it, unconsciously. This nostalgia leads to the hatred of any substantive change. Since Sanders wishes to make substantive changes, they despise him despite that his program will greatly help their own children and grandchildren.

The third reason for the Bernie hatred, dare I say, is more understandable given the precarity of the financial situation for many people in the US, including those in the Boomer/Gen X demographic. This is the natural fear of Sanders altering enough where their house prices fall and they lose a little of their retirement security. Of course if Sanders actually made the changes he’s been discussing they’d be more secure in their retirement, but fear of change is natural and comprehensible. I feel sympathy if not empathy for them as they’ve largely been responsible for despoiling the world and destroying the dreams and the aspirations of their own children and grandchildren, and are attempting to avoid the culpability for this, while often being in an uncertain financial situation themselves. It’s a lot of cognitive dissonance for anyone to handle. And wow, they do not handle it well at all.

Those, then, are the three main causes behind the Boomer/Gen X Bernie hatred. He is a repudiation of everything they stood for and the enshrouded narrative by which they’ve lived their lives. There’s a natural aversion, even if they don’t articulate very well, mainly noting how “unpleasant” and “annoying” he is without further examination. Examination, of course, would lead to actually thinking about why they feel this way and that would be painful, so this they do not do.

Gan No Stan

The reason I would not eat these corporate vegan foods is they are not healthy. They are filled with almost literal garbage. They are in no way healthful or worth eating other than for religious reasons.

Aside from that, veganism is not a healthy dietary option in general. Adults can survive on such a debased diet for a while (though evidence shows most vegans backslide as they are not getting enough nutrition), but it’s actively dangerous for kids and those with chronic illnesses.

Veganism is a religion, really, masquerading as a diet. And corporate veganism is even worse.

About a Drum

John Scalzi is not that different than Kevin Drum. He’s a little smarter — doesn’t make enormous and obvious economic mistakes nearly as often. But he’s just hoping, like most centrists, that nothing changes until he dies.

Sure, he’s a Democrat, but he’s a neoliberal. That is the one thing that crosses party lines. And he brings up the mythical Bernie-bros, as all centrists are required to. Bernie-bros are like Bigfoot — many people claim to have seen one and yet when prodded centrists can produce no evidence of their existence.

This is why I believe climate change will be far more devastating than most people now expect. There are tons of de facto denialists like Scalzi, who while “believing” in climate change really hope nothing substantive is done to reverse it as that would mean systemic change (and his house price might drop a little). And he doesn’t want much else to change, either, as it’d be truly inconvenient.

Scalzi is typical, which is why his sf is so boring.

Morders

Ok, that’s devastatingly accurate. For liberals, open borders is an aspirational belief, kind of like professing to believe in “love” or “truth.” It doesn’t mean anything, carries no consequences or benefits, and has no actions associated with it. There is no accounting for the huge societal transition this would cause, or that it’d most likely eliminate most welfare and social services in the US.

It’d kind of like a kid believing in Santa Claus. It sounds great: presents, cookies, no responsibilities, stuff just magically shows up, all is well.

How would open borders work, exactly? I don’t trust people with no plan. And hope combined with Christmas is not a plan.

Changer

Performative wokeness and sending useless signals is tons easier. I understand because I engage in the same behavior, often, but at least I realize I am doing it and know it’s not likely to change anything. These people actually think they are resisting and changing the world.

Buff Right Out

I Shouldnโ€™t Have to Publish This in The New York Times. The way we regulated social media platforms didnโ€™t end harassment, extremism or disinformation. It only gave them more power and made the problem worse.

Alas, likely very prescient indeed.

According to the left, censorship solves all problems! And open borders make complete sense! If it weren’t for all the even worse ideas from the right, the left would seem like complete buffoons

I need my own planet.

Photons and Trees

Some of this article is interesting, but this isn’t very consequential.

Solar energy arrives on Earth and becomes mass in the form of green leaves, creating food we can eat and use as fuel for thought.

This is not wrong, exactly, but very, very, very little mass in plants comes from photons. It’s vanishingly tiny. Something like 99.9999% of the mass of a plant comes from carbon in the air, water, and nutrients in the soil and definitely not from photons (energy).

It’s surprisingly difficult to find out how many watt-hours of energy for instance an average tree actually absorbs per year, so let’s just try to get order of magnitude estimate going on. Assume a small tree absorbs (not receives) 100,000 watt-hours of energy per year. How much of this will be converted to mass?

One watt-hour of energy absorbed is roughly equal to 40 picograms of mass gained. Therefore, 100,000WH x 40pg = 4,000,000pg.

Thus, one small tree would gain only 0.000004 of a gram of mass from solar radiation per year. That’s 4 millionths of a gram of mass.

Do you know why plants gain mass from solar radiation? Yes, yes, mass-energy equivalence, but it’s not hard if you think about how photosynthesis occurs. But that’s a tale for another time.

Regions

Check this out; the only such map I’ve seen that gets the cultural region of North Florida correct:

North Florida is very much Deep South in culture and history. I’d quibble with the dividing line between Deep South and Mid-Atlantic South there a bit, but great job whoever produced this.