Cons of Cons

This is a bad take.

What’s really happening lately is that many on the left (and I don’t mean all the pseudo-progressives out there) have been bludgeoned with charges of “conspiracy theorist” for events that verifiably happened in reality, and often very recently. This will continue to happen as centrists like this lose control of the narrative and anything that doesn’t fit what they want you to believe gets branded as “conspiracy theory.”

It’s a desperation move, but it is in part working — so it will roll on.

VCon

Quite a while ago, I wrote a script for monitoring and reconnecting a VPN link. It’s fairly old now and some of the features it depends on have changed a great deal. The script works still but I have no idea how. It should not work but it does. I accidentally wrote a great failure state into that script and now I’m not changing it to see just how long it plugs away, failing successfully.

Fiver

Despite my good language skills, it’s very hard for me to be truly fluent in another language because I simply do not like talking to people.

This means I can get pretty good at reading many languages, but can’t speak one of them even beyond a five-year-old level. Since I show no signs of enjoying talking to people, this is unlikely to change in the future.

Doomberg

Mike Bloomberg is the primordial tech bro dipshit, the progenitor from which all current tech bros have sprung.

And he’s worse than Biden because at least Biden isn’t virulently racist. That is one thing I can say about him. Bloomberg did one smart thing during the 1980s and it made him a billionaire. Everything after that has been calamitously ignorant and harmful.

Grain

“The utopian springs of the dogma of laissez-faire are but incompletely understood as long as they are viewed separately. The three tenetsโ€”competitive labor market, automatic gold standard, and international free tradeโ€”formed one whole. The sacrifices involved in achieving any one of them were useless, if not worse, unless the other two were equally secured. It was everything or nothing.

Anybody could see that the gold standard, for instance, meant danger of deadly deflation and, maybe, of fatal monetary stringency in a panic. The manufacturer could, therefore, hope to hold his own only if he was assured of an increasing scale of production at remunerative prices (in other words, only if wages fell at least in proportion to the general fall in prices, so as to allow the exploitation of an ever- expanding world market). Thus the Anti-Corn Law Bill of 1846 was the corollary of Peelโ€™s Bank Act of 1844, and both assumed a laboring class which, since the Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834, was forced to give its best under the threat of hunger, so that wages were regulated by the price of grain. The three great measures formed a coherent whole.”

The Great Transformation by Karl Polanyi