Let’s Prey On It

Things like this have started to convince me that “progressives” see pretty much all relationships as one of predator/prey:

If you examine all the “any age gap is evil” and “dating outside your race is racism” and such in that light, it starts to make more sense — and this predator/prey belief also matches up perfectly with the neoliberalistic mindset. Contextualized this way, applying as a lens this assumed adversarial nature of relationships, and the boring contract negotiation aspect that progressives seem to adore, it all begins to resolve into some sort of legible but fucked-up ideology.

When you apply this ideology, that every relationships is by nature adversarial, predator/prey, a contest to get the best de facto contract, the panic over someone not being exactly like someone else makes a whole lot more sense.

Progressive “morals” are some wacky bullshit.

Hate All

Exactly. I’ll never endure much Internet hate because motherfuckers know for a fact that I will find them and be standing over their bed with a knife at 3AM, smiling.

This prevents a lot of that! And I have money. Hate all you want, IDGAF.

Canid

Every time I think about it, it mystifies me that progressives do really seem to think that women are these agency-less children (talking about those over 18 here) who can be trained like not-particularly-bright dogs.

Where, just where, did this come from and what the fuck happened to feminism?

Apartment

An ex-girlfriend’s father used to rent an apartment in the Washington D.C. area in the mid to late 1960s by working part time at a grocery store. No roommates — that’s just how cheap it used to be then.

Try that now.

Add Musc

This is 100% true. I didn’t start attempting to lose weight until nearly two years into my weightlifting.

All of the other time, I was attempting to gain weight so I could add muscle. This is how you do it.

Different Reasons

I’ve been goofing on it a lot lately, but I have been seriously pondering the desire of many “progressives” to eliminate the idea of consent from those 18+ to attempt to understand it.

In prog circles, it’s starting to move towards the idea that women can only consent if they are 30+ or even older, and anything more than a two year age gap — no matter how old the relationship participants might be — is de facto rape. How does one go about understanding this? It’s senseless and frankly utterly insane from most perspectives, so I haven’t yet fully found the ideological lens that sharpens it for me into any sort of focus.

What Geoff is talking about, where everything is politicized, is part of it, but I don’t think that captures the entire panoply of reasons that progressives want to remove the ability of people to decide what is best in their own lives. The conservatives make too much of the nanny state plaint, but they are not entirely wrong about this and examining it from that perspective provides a few insights.

Another important component is the dominance of neoliberalism. If everyone can be herded away from any natural relationships developing, any actual connection, into algorithmically-approved predictable liaisons, then selling to these people and prognosticating their future actions becomes vastly easier. Apart from politicization, this is a large portion of it I think.

And another aspect that’s not insubstantial is that as women have gained more power, they have of course tended to be older, and thus they have a nice lever to eliminate dating market competition by making larger age gap relationships immoral or illegal.

I suspect in the future that any relationship with more than a three or four year age gap will be made outright illegal, and all relationships will go through some sort of “social review” where they are either approved or denied based on a variety of factors, sociological and educational.

This is the progressive “utopia” (really a dystopia). Now get in the pod and eat your bugs.