Economist Logic

Economist: There are no shortages if you exclude food, microchips, cars, houses, and energy.

Normal person: So anything I need to live is excluded. What sense does that make?

Economist: You don’t have a PhD so you obviously don’t know what you need to live, peon.

(We need better experts. Really really need them.)

Dang Kno

Indeed. There are certainly tons of things the right disbelieves that science shows very conclusively (such as the effectiveness of the Covid vaccines of late), but there are also many things that the left refuses to believe that are also true or quite likely are substantially true.

A friend of mine refers to this as “dangerous knowledge,” at least some of the items on that latter list, because if they were true it’s probably worse for the world than if they were false.

Sometimes, depending on my mood, I agree with her and sometimes I don’t. But Nils is right: there are truths in science that ethically, politically, and humanistically suck.

Weirding Module

I have the same problem. I have to think consciously about, “Is this weird? Would normals think this is weird, and if so, why?” before I do anything.

LIke Aella, I’ve gotten pretty good at predicting it, just as I learned to have high-quality social interactions, but not a thing about it is intuitive as it is for others.

Duneation

I’m not really a Dune fan overall, by the way. It’s a very bleak and hopeless vision of the galaxy and of humanity’s future. Regressive, too.

It’s just not something I am particularly interested in for itself. I like the spectacle and seeing what people do with it on the screen, though.

Armor

Let me see…the armorer, the person whose whole fucking job is to know what’s happening with the firearms on set, doesn’t know where the live ammo came from. As if ammo just appears out of nowhere somehow and jumps in a gun. Alrighty then.