7B

Smith & Wesson Model 686 Plus 357 Magnum 7in Stainless Pistol.

This is my favorite gun I’ve ever shot. Never owned it myself; it was my dad’s. I could hit damn near anything up to 100 meters with that pistol due to its long barrel and great sights. My dad even had a scope for it, though I preferred shooting it without that.

There used to be a model with an 8 and 3/8″ barrel, but I don’t think they make that one anymore. Never fired that variant, though.

Just thinking about guns a bit because of what’s about to happen in this country.

Roe Gone

I have been. Women will have trouble getting treated in many states for anything because they can potentially be pregnant. It happened pre-Roe and will happen now too.

Crush

The fascists really are gearing up. They’ve been prepping for 50 years and think now is their moment. They may well be right.

Lifetime

I told people in fucking high school — high school! — that Roe would go down in my lifetime. No one listened. And now here we are. I ain’t dead.

Auto

Exactly right. He won’t ever respect you if he doesn’t grant you basic bodily autonomy. Leave that sucker; abuser in training.

If Life Gives You Liminal

One of the few people who understands what is about to happen, and the broad outlines of what will occur (and why/how).

Now, this will be in the “never happen” category. Soon, it will be “obvious.”

Decidable

“In this section, we prove one of the most philosophically important theorems of the theory of computation: There is a specific problem that is algorithmically unsolvable. Computers appear to be so powerful that you may believe that all problems will eventually yield to them. The theorem presented here demonstrates that computers are limited in a fundamental way.

What sorts of problems are unsolvable by computer? Are they esoteric, dwelling only in the minds of theoreticians? No! Even some ordinary problems that people want to solve turn out to be computationally unsolvable.

In one type of unsolvable problem, you are given a computer program and a precise specification of what that program is supposed to do (e.g., sort a list of numbers). You need to verify that the program performs as specified (i.e., that it is correct). Because both the program and the specification are mathematically precise objects, you hope to automate the process of verification by feeding these objects into a suitably programmed computer. However, you will be disappointed. The general problem of software verification is not solvable by computer.”

โ€“Introduction to the Theory of Computation. 3e, by Michael Sipser

Fallo

And so it begins.

No Fait

Like most things, this is a choice that dumbasses like this are telling us is fait accompli. They just like taking things away, really. That’s all it is.

Serious

Indeed. Things are getting serious now.