I think I’ve figured out where liberals are coming from with their over-broad definition of what constitutes “harassment” now. And it amounts to this: if it inconveniences capital, or causes a person to be unpredictable to the algorithm or the system, it’s harassment. This centers the interests of capital and the cult of productivity over any concerns about love or partners actually being good for one another or even any matters of deep love and affection. Capital does not care about love or affection; capital cares about predictability, compliance and control.

I know, I know, it seems obvious when you state it like that but I hadn’t quite connected all the threads that way until now, even though I had discussed many parts separately before.

Since liberals are just tools of capital, they must do nothing but parrot its priorities and demands. Thus doing anything but dating your “appropriate” algorithmic choice is harassment because it is illegible to the interests of capital.