Tell me you don’t have a sense of the implications of Gödel’s theorems without telling me https://t.co/IHVAfJm87s

— Joe Norman (@normonics) April 4, 2022

LOL WUT?

Gödel’s theorems are making very narrow and specific points about what can be proven in formal axiomatic theories. They don’t have any deeper meaning. They don’t imply anything. Anyway, Tarski’s Undefinability Theorem would be better cited as an example here, not Gödel’s theorems. And that would still be garbage.

This guy is a dumbass.