Feminism pretends that the point of #MeToo and other systems of HR-friendly behavior restriction is to keep aggressive and dangerous men away from women. But this is not the point at all. The reality is that it’s to build a firewall between women and low-status men regardless of those men’s other qualities.

Many women (and most feminists) like dangerous men if they are attractive. Amanda Marcotte is a good example of that, and she’s fairly standard. To quote another blog, “On the whole, women hate low status men far more than they hate men who actively oppress women.”

I wish I’d realized that and all of the above sooner. Absolutely true, alas, of most women. There’s nothing worse to most women than low-status, undesirable men. Dangerous men? Threatening men? Aggressive men? All good. It’s why you see much derision against geeky men, and claiming they alone are the creeps and assaulters, when in reality the rates of sexual assault among frat-boy types is 3-10x higher, depending on how you measure it.

(Don’t get me wrong here; this is obviously not all women. But it’s most, and nearly all of modern feminists, especially any PMC liberal feminist.)