Shape of things

To change the future, you have to understand the past.

Also, Waldman makes the same point Iโ€™ve been railing about for the last couple of years.

The โ€œstay in your laneโ€ mentality that seems to undergird so much progressive discourseโ€”only polyamorous green people really โ€œgetโ€ the โ€œpolyamorous green experience,โ€ and therefore only polyamorous greens should read and write about polyamorous greens, sayโ€”ignores our common humanity.

That authors should only write about those exactly like them seems like such a colossally bad idea that Iโ€™m absolutely flummoxed that anyone could have ever been convinced of its virtue, nor can I comprehend how it has become so widespread in what passes for modern discourse.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *