When You Lose

The Israelis killed more children under 5 than there were children under 5. That’s quite a trick. They must’ve been resurrecting then killing them again.

The true death toll in the Gaza is around 30,000-50,000, most fighting-age males. That’s still a lot, to be clear. But not any form of genocide. That’s just what it looks like when you badly lose a war you stupidly started.

NAT Not

IPv6 is not insecure because it lacks a NAT.

Not this asinine shit again. I hate this idiot and idiots like this in general. That is, the “Well, ackshually” shitheels who ignore how anything is in the real world, standard practices, and how things actually work. And also do not really understand the tech, either.

First of all, you stupid motherfucker, a device can (and most consumer crap does) implement NAPT/PAT with dynamic state but often has1 no explicit packet-filter policy engine (what most people would term a “firewall”), yet will still refuse unsolicited inbound flows simply because these flows donโ€™t match any mapping/state. That is in fact de facto protection via reachability restriction. And that behavior is explicitly defined in NAT RFCs. The NAT RFCs in fact directly discuss filtering behavior associated with NAT operations (not just a separate firewall). Check out RFC 4787 (BCP 127), RFC 5382 (BCP 142), RFC 5508 (BCP 148) and RFC 7857 for how NAT really works. I’ve read those documents in toto several times over the years. I can guarantee that doofus has not.

Miraculously, he is right that โ€œNAT isnโ€™t designed as security,โ€ but the clown-ass shitstain then uses that to imply โ€œNAT adds no security value,โ€ which is false in actual practice. Nearly every existing IPv4 NAT (NAPT/PAT) gateway2 enforces stateful inbound blocking out of the box. This NAT — independent of the router’s firewall function — does provide decent default-on security for home users.

On the other hand, his core premise (โ€œmodern routers default-deny inbound IPv6 anywayโ€) is absolutely not a sure thing. Standards and real deployments often have non-optimal defaults, including configs that default-forward unsolicited inbound IPv6 traffic. This is because unlike IPv4, IPv6 expects end-to-end connectivity. So that means many router vendors ship equipment that way. Thus, having NAT adds quite hardy extra protection in practice. That is to say, with any IPv4 home NAT you need both a firewall hole and a port-forward/mapping mistake to expose a device. With IPv6 global addressing, exposure can occur with only one minor screw-up. Then boom, your whole network is out there on the wide-open internet.

This disphit’s NAT explanation is also crazy sloppy (he frames it as mainly destination-rewrite based on static port forwards), just glossing over or ignoring that the real โ€œdefault denyโ€ effect largely comes from dynamically created state. He overstates a conditional truth (โ€œIPv6 is fine if you keep equivalent edge filteringโ€) into an unsupported and often-wrong universal claim, using cherry-picked vendor defaults as if they were always the case. Also, he deliberately handwaves away as irrelevant the safety margin NAT provides in reality every damn day.

NAT wasn’t designed for security, wah wah. Carbon steel wasn’t designed for armor, either, but we use it for that in the real world.

My conclusion: Fuck this fucking clown who doesn’t know a damn thing, and what he thinks he knows is wrong. Read the RFCs, motherfucker. I’ll wait. You won’t understand them anyway, but I’ll still wait.

  1. And does not require.
  2. I have not seen one in 20+ years that does not.

Whatever is causing this, it's not American. The machine is global.

These Gravitationally Lensed Supernovae Could Resolve The Hubble Tension.

The Brazilianization of the World.

The reality of trying to make US manufacturing great again.

โ€˜I had hoped the virus would be contained in Chinaโ€™: An inside look at the Fedโ€™s historic fight to save the U.S. economy.

The first commercial space station, Haven-1, is now undergoing assembly for launch.

Blood test can identify cancer in patients with non-specific symptoms.

This Is Why Our Rivers Are Turning Into Sewers.

A.I. and Our Economic Future.

Soar

Productivity surges.

All y’all gonna cry like little babies but trust me, it’s AI. And economists can lie all they like, but it’s still AI.

It’s just possible to do more with fewer people now. Just the other day I had AI write a PowerShell script in 20 seconds that would’ve taken me a few hours myself. And I’m pretty good at PowerShell. The end result was also better than what I would’ve produced.

This is happening all over the economy now and is only going to increase.

Get used to it, get using it, or be content with your Maytag box beside the road.

Europe Is Bracing for a New Trade Fight With Trump. Here Are Its Options.

Morally judging famous and semi-famous people.

Jay Powell, the Prepster Banker Who Is Standing Up to Trump.

Glaciers are melting. It may reawaken the worldโ€™s most dangerous volcanoes.

When did humanity take its first step? Scientists say they now know.

Matt Damon says Netflix asks creators to repeat the plot "three or four times" for people on their phones. The modern world pretty much sucks and smartphones are 100% evil.

Capturing the Moment a White Dwarf Exploded.

Trump has rolled out many of the Project 2025 policies he once claimed ignorance about.

Air Safety Already Had Gaps. Then the Shutdown Came.

First direct evidence of Migdal effect opens new path for dark matter search.

The Rise and Fall of the American Monoculture. For most of the 20th century, pop culture was the glue that held the U.S. together. But what will it mean now that everything has splintered?

โ€˜Soak the Richโ€™ Battle Cry is Rising From London to California.

Economists Are Studying the Slowing Job Marketโ€”and Feeling It Themselves.

S-VHS

Whatโ€™s your white whale – something youโ€™ve been looking for for years but never found?

Not quite what the OP is asking, but I had a lot of music videos recorded on Super-VHS from MTV and other sources, some of which are not available on YouTube or any other service. I had a couple dozen of these tapes back in the 1990s, all two hours long.

Those tapes were thrown away or sold for drugs, not sure which.

Some of those videos will probably never be seen by anyone again. I doubt there are any master copies extant at the studios, and if no one can unearth a copy on VHS, they are gone forever.