Radical Eyes

I’ve not looked into it statistically and probably will not, but I’d bet pretty big money that the net effect of #MeToo was a fairly large reduction in relationship and household formation.

Mainly, #MeToo achieved two things. The first was to stupidly radicalize a lot of women in hugely harmful (mostly to them) ways. And the second was that it scared off normal, good men from talking with or flirting with women.

Like most of the inane crap the left does these days, a huge failure.

Brain Cook

An extremely easy way to set Gen Z off and distract them from substantive issues is to joke about anything to do with sex, especially if it’s between “unauthorized” groups, such as:

1) Anyone 2+ years older than anyone else in any relationship context (even friendship here).

2) Anyone in a different higher-status career field than their paramour.

3) Anyone blue collar vs. white collar.

4) Anyone who makes more money than their partner.

5) Anyone taller than their partner.

6) Anyone of a different race than their partner.

There are others, but those are the ones that really get their blood boiling. Of course, talk about sex in general does. But combine it with any one of those (try two or more for added fun!) to really cooks their brains.

In many ways, they are worse than the very worst prudes from our history. And that’s something, because we had literal fucking Puritans as founding stock.

Resentment

Women like poor, poor Jessica down there are resentful and affronted because they can’t date the 6’4″ billionaire with a private jet. Or when they do, it turns into a short fling and they do not commit. This is a female form of inceldom. And it’s not pretty.

Meanwhile, many men are resentful that no women anywhere are interested in them at all.

I think there’s a slight difference there.

I Ran, I Ran So Far Away

Ah, one of those “feminist” dipshits who wants to invert the sexual double standards instead of just going for equality. Also, she’s just upset that women are no longer 100% of the time the sexual gatekeepers.

So, “feminism for thee but not for me.” Gotcha.

I have some ideas about why she’s single at 39…because any sane man would stay far, far, so very far away from whatever is going on there. You know there’d be a false rape accusation at the minimum in your near future, if not worse.

And you also know here that “mistreated other women” means that these men were with women who were not her — more attractive ones. Of course.

CCC

Agreed with all of this. That Carney speech was cornpone catastrophic crapola. It’s spineless and it’s daft. “Embrace decline and failure” isn’t the brilliant rhetorical and managerial masterstroke the intelligentsia is portraying it as. I guess they must be this way, though. The alternative is actually doing something substantive: undertaking large projects; reversing decline; declaring the West worth fighting for.

And you know none of that is going to happen. So you get that milquetoast garbage from Carney and ilk.

Safety Obsession

I started going out alone when I was seven, though I wasn’t allowed to roam that far. This was considered completely normal at the time, though in other ways my parents were neglectful. By the time I was around 9, though, I could go wherever I wanted. All the other kids I knew were the same.

We really have chosen the path of harming entire generations for no known reason.

Unat

For the unattractive men, whatโ€™s a harsh memory that sticks with you?

I don’t think I’m unattractive any longer, but growing up my North Florida compatriots certainly thought I was lower than pond scum by any measure.

That said, my experiences were similar to this dude’s: More than once, girls/women approached me completely unprompted to tell me how hideous I was and to not even think of asking them out.

This was with me not even looking their way or even noticing them (as they were themselves nothing special). Of course, this is just a female version of bullying. Women tend to be non-physical with it.

Just leaving North Florida eliminated 99.9999% of that type of thing. The nature there is great; the people are fucking terrible.

When You Lose

The Israelis killed more children under 5 than there were children under 5. That’s quite a trick. They must’ve been resurrecting then killing them again.

The true death toll in the Gaza is around 30,000-50,000, most fighting-age males. That’s still a lot, to be clear. But not any form of genocide. That’s just what it looks like when you badly lose a war you stupidly started.