Untaught

Men have been taught to deal with their immanent aggression and pugnaciousness, but it’s 100% verboten to help women learn to deal with their inherent greater neuroticism and intrasexual competition tendencies.

And it’s making them insane.

Continuum

Claiming that human sex is not binary based on rare exceptions is fucking moronic. It’s just clown-level thinking. I don’t even have any real investment in this except being intellectually rigorous as much as I can. Idiotically arguing that sex is not binary in humans is just obviously wrong, so it bothers me. It is like arguing that stars don’t exist because there are some gas clouds that aren’t stars.

It’s just the absolute stupidest kind of academia-brain nonthinking.

First of fucking all, biologists define sex by gamete type. Anisogamous species have exactly two: small mobile gametes (sperm) and large immobile ones (ova). There is no third gamete and no intermediate one, so the categories have nothing between them. Height, testosterone levels, voice pitch, and body fat distribution are bimodal. Those are sex-correlated traits, not sex. Not the same thing; not even close.

This clown-level thinking has a name, by the way. It’s called the “continuum fallacy.” In short, that means that some people want you to believe that because a boundary has fuzzy or rare edge cases, the categories arenโ€™t real. It’s a way of sneaking propaganda into science.

And if you engage in that fallacy, it demonstrates you should not be doing science. As you are not — you are doing propaganda.

Basic Prude

Prudishness doesn’t just extend to sex and showing some skin, of course. It’s also things like this.

I do not have a cohesive theory for all this, but it just seems like so many people have a squeamishness of dealing with the world as it is. And that’s pretty divergent from how I grew up in the 1980s and 1990s.

To me, it seems like everyone just got fragile in every realm, and unable to handle reality or its depiction.

Gym Trap

Correct. This incarnation of revealing gym outfits is designed to be a trap (as opposed to what it was during the last time this was common, during the 1980s). And by that I mean women wear incredibly revealing outfits in the gym in an attempt to have some man look at them for a fraction of a second to “prove” that all men are creepy perverts. Then they leverage that for even more attention online.

In the 1980s, the same outfits were worn for a completely different reason: to show off and to attract men. This time, however, it’s about being weird and antisocial. Much worse and destructive of community and civilization itself.

It’s strange to think revealing outfits can be a sign of prudishness, but in this case that’s what happening. OnlyFans can also be explained similarly.

We Do Exist

Allie โœž on X: "I'm realizing a lot of people still seem to believe "Extroverts recharge by being around people, introverts recharge by being alone!" ....there's zero evidence for this, in fact, the evidence pretty heavily debunks this framing! 1) Socializing lifts mood for basically everyone" / X

However, this from Allie is wrong and fucking moronic. It’s not “debunked.” It just clear that she — like most extroverts — just does not understand introversion at all.

Why are extroverts always attempting to prove introverts don’t exist? Just why? I don’t care how much I like someone — after a few hours or at most days I just need to be alone.

Always have been that way, always will be. No, I am not socially anxious; I’m the least anxious person you’ll probably ever meet.

What the fuck is with this weird extrovert obsession with “proving” we aren’t real?

This is a good response to the bullshit Allie is claiming:

Make a Trade

This is the propaganda women are being fed and it’s why many of them act the absolutely demented way they do. TikTok et al. is full of this type of YASSS QUEEN!!! nonsense.

But Wil is right. Hell, I get flirted with these days nearly every time I’m out by myself and there’s no way I could do better than my partner. So y’all fuckers ain’t got a chance in hell. Also, I just don’t understand the concept of treating people like baseball cards, trading them when you get tired of them.

And people wonder why women are so unhappy; this is why. This deeply evil slopaganda.

Being Conned

That’s right. Moron economists insist nothing has changed.

But compulsory items have gotten vastly more expensive while optional ones have decreased or barely increased. And those same idiot econs tell us that it’s irrelevant. Because that’s their role, to lie for money so the status quo keeps quo-ing.

But of course it is relevant.

Downing

My views have changed, yes, but honestly we should just kill people like this. Just put them down like dogs. There’s no reason this person is still breathing. We are too soft on human garbage and it is costing us.