Of Any Concern

I don’t agree with all of this, but Europe pretending to defend Greenland while doing nearly nothing to defend Ukraine with actual troops == fucking INSANE. Do they not care that if Russia succeeds in Ukraine, then their own countries will be overrun with Russian (really conscripted slave Ukrainian) meat waves? Is that not of any concern to the EU? Apparently not.

Well, they dug their grave. Russia will put them in it.

Liter8

This is already occurring. Neal Stephenson was right. I predict we’ll revert to roughly the historical norm with about 10-20% of the population literate to any degree. The rest will only be capable of watching and sending video and can recognize the occasional word.

What would stop that outcome? Nothing that I can see.

Sys and Sys

Systems Confrontation and System Destruction Warfare.

Finally! Someone who knows what the fuck is going on and how China will handle a war with the US.

Yes, this is how China would do it. I could’ve written this myself. If I’d had an army of consultants and a boatload of time. There are still people left somewhere who can think about the actual world as it is rather than as they imagine it to be. Cool.

Paying Out

Russian spy ship โ€˜directed lasersโ€™ at UK forces, says defense secretary.

Again, NATO is already at war with Russia. It’s just that no one besides Russia is acting like it.

We should actively be kicking Russia out of Ukraine now with 500,000 troops as well as shoring up defenses in the Baltics and Poland. Germany as well.

But we aren’t and won’t. And we’ll pay for that heavily in a few years.

Actual War

No, China won’t do much if any bridge-blowing. First, it’s not a very effective tactic compared to the alternatives. Bridges are extremely strong (for obvious reasons) so it’s not actually easy to take most of them out with conventional weapons. Second, the US has an extensive road network with many alternate routes.

What China would actually do to hobble our logistics is bomb our seaports and data centers. This is much easier, much more effective, and these are vastly harder to do impromptu repairs on.

An Offensive Offensive

Russia’s latest big Ukraine offensive gains next to nothing, again

Ian Welsh: WINNING! OMG I LOVE PUTIN!

Everyone else: Seems not that great to sacrifice 500+ people for every dozen meters gained. That’s not really sustainable.

More seriously, Russia’s strategic position is incredibly weak and worsening as the war goes on. Time used to be on Putin’s side but as Europe seems to be waking up to the peril a bit, it no longer is.

At the pace of the past 30 days, seizing what remains of the four regions Mr Putin already claimsโ€”Luhansk, Donetsk, Kherson and Zaporizhiaโ€”would take until June 2030. (For Russia to occupy all of Ukraine would require a further 103 years.)

Russia will never occupy all of Ukraine because the attacker’s problem is that as the lines get smaller, they also get easier to defend. (This is due to having less distance to spread personnel and war materiel over.) Ukraine will not give up the fight easily as they know a genocide will occur if they do, so the war will grind on 2-3 more years until Russia agrees to a cease-fire and then tries again in 7-10 years.

That’s my best guess, anyway.

Cuts

Yes. China’ll be taking out satellites, cutting undersea cables, hacking infrastructure and bombing data centers.

How do I know? Because that’s what I’d do, and I’m awesome at this shit.

Revert

I was talking to my partner about something very similar earlier today. The idea of continual upward progression is an illusion. Unless we make it happen. We seem to be turning away from that, so the most likely eventuality is regression to the mean.

Which is that most people are illiterate. Secularism is rare. Most states, if they exist at all, are heavily authoritarian and repressive. Wars are common, but small. Tech is still present but mostly comes from those few states that have not been Islamicized.

We should be trying hard to avoid this fate but don’t appear to be doing much.

Slam

In the near term, Russia and China are the greatest risks.

In the medium term, though, nuclear war with an Islamicized Europe is a pretty significant risk. Assuming the current trends continue, an Islamic, extremely repressive Europe is likely in 40-60 years. They’ll have French (or Pakistani, or both) nukes by then.

And that’ll be very bad for the US.

Backwaters and Frontwaters

I basically agree with this. Europe will be Islamicized. It’ll be a backwater for 500 years, much as it used to be. The USA will go Christian dominionist and will resemble the pre-US 1730s and 1740s again, but for 300-500 years too. Also a horrible oppressive also-ran.

China is in decline, but probably will at least avoid being turned into a theocracy or theocracy-lite.

The future probably lies with Latin America and non-China Asian states (not India).