The problem

The problem with ferreting out bullshit in scientific papers even in areas that Iโ€™m pretty familiar with is that even not-that-difficult publication take a long time to read, even longer to fully understand, and to do the calculations all over again is nearly impossible (for me).

How does the average person even stand a chance? They donโ€™t. They really donโ€™t.

This paper for instance is 45 pages long.

The paperโ€™s premise is that 100% of the decline in the US labor share of income is due to intellectual property. This doesnโ€™t even pass the sniff test, but Iโ€™m willing to give the paper a fair shot at convincing me. (So far it has not.)

However, even to make sense of one not-that-hard paper without any complex math, it has taken me about two hours. And I think I know where and why the authors went wrong. But itโ€™d take me another 10-15 hours of work to prove it, which Iโ€™m not planning on doing because I donโ€™t have that kind of time.

My point is that 90% of science could be utter BS (even though I donโ€™t think it is) and no one would ever know. Or at least not many people.

Damn, we humans need an upgrade. This software just isnโ€™t cutting it. It is buggy, slow, prone to failure at the worst possible times and canโ€™t easily be improved.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *