How can delusional Democrats read something like this and conclude that Hillary Clinton (or anyone like her) represents their interests and values their concerns?

But Mrs. Clinton has been more than accessible to those who reside in some of the country’s most moneyed enclaves and are willing to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to see her. In the last two weeks of August, Mrs. Clinton raked in roughly $50 million at 22 fund-raising events, averaging around $150,000 an hour, according to a New York Times tally.

And while Mrs. Clinton has faced criticism for her failure to hold a news conference for months, she has fielded hundreds of questions from the ultrarich in places like the Hamptons, Martha’s Vineyard, Beverly Hills and Silicon Valley.

And this.

Yet some of the closest relationships Mrs. Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, have are with their longstanding contributors. If she feels most at ease around millionaires, within the gilded bubble, it is in part because they are some of her most intimate friends.

I’m gagging over here.

I just can’t conceive of any world where people like this — who seem to genuinely believe that Clinton has their best interests at heart — can square that with her policies and behavior.

No, I don’t think Trump would make a better president and will not be voting for him.

However, there just has to be vast cognitive dissonance going on for anyone to look at the evidence before them and conclude that Clinton or anyone of her class will do anything but be a complete sellout to the ultra-rich and Wall Street banksters, and do her best to make the country worse for everyone else and better for them.

It’s completely puzzling to me how many people can be so deluded. I guess, though, that’s how politics works and perhaps must work.

I’m not with her — or anyone who wants to sell me and my nation out to the predators of society.