Bother sum

I know the answer is that philosophy is bad and thinking more than mechanistically like a wind-up clock is invalid, but why does is not bother more math type people that there is a vast infinity of non-computable real numbers?

It is one of the few math proofs I can understand well (like many of the fundamental ones, it is not that hard in either common variant). I know that it doesnโ€™t have many if any consequences for the real world or math as constructed (as Gรถdelโ€™s incompleteness theorems also do not), but still it seems like something fundamentally broken in how reality as we perceive it is ordered.

Other than my complete lack of ability โ€” such as spending three years trying to learn to do quadratic equations and failing โ€” one of the reasons I could never pursue math is that it seems to be a house built on ghosts of broken, vanished universes.

These philosophical concerns are minor to non-existent for most people I know, but for me they arenโ€™t and never could be just a quibble.

They are โ€” to borrow the title of a decent sf novel โ€” a reality dysfunction.