It is a 100% false โfactโ that in Vietnam (or anywhere else that has been said about) that 90% of soldiers didnโt fire their weapons to kill. Or as sometimes is heard, at all.
Iโve seen this claim trotted out about WWI, WWII, Vietnam, and other conflicts. But itโs made up. Itโs just deceit and delusion. I believe where this faux fact comes from is that it takes a lot of ammo downrange to kill any one hostile. Suppressive fire is most of the fire used in every modern war. By design, by the way. In the Afghanistan war, for instance, there were 250,000 rounds fired for every insurgent killed.
This absurd nonsense gets trotted out about various wars depending on what sort of ideological axe is being ground and itโs just lunacy, for a few reasons but the main one is this: when the enemy is on top of you and youโre in small arms range, youโre often fighting for your life. Even the most pacifist and wilting soldier is going to be tossing whatever they have downrange at any target they can plausibly identify.
How do people believe such goofy crap?