Nost

โ€œโ€˜The cinema is an invention without a future,โ€™ Louis Lumiรจre supposedly declared at the dawn of movie history. The historical parallel in Hugo, meanwhile, is also partially a wink to the future of movies in the digital age: if film survived, and even thrived, in the twentieth century, then certainly digital cinema (in whatever form) will thrive in the twenty-first. The anachronism, though, is readily apparent in the filmโ€™s unapologetic nostalgia. Hugo is more about understanding present developments (digital cinematography and 3D exhibition) in the movie industry through past future(s)โ€”the then-unimaginable potential of early cinema that even someone as visionary as Lumiรจre apparently couldnโ€™t seeโ€”than about actually imagining the still unrealized futures of digital cinema. There is an active resistance to imagining the future in favor of a reassuringly nostalgic look back since capitalismโ€™s greatest strength may be shutting down the potential futures of possible alternatives.โ€

โ€“Jason Sperb in Flickers of Film: Nostalgia in the Time of Digital Cinema