Why did “feminists” believe attempting to stigmatize and even ban attraction itself would go well for them long-term?
What the hell were they thinking?
Annoying
PV
It’s overly complex, offers nothing I need and is 10x harder to manage and reason about.
IPv6 is only suitable for things like huge cellphone and sometimes ISP networks. Has no other real purpose no matter what the Hacker News tards claim.
Glisten Here
A whole lot of modern women:
Op Bop
Most things are an op. And the left loves that shit because 99% of them are antisemitic.
Simil
That’s the problem, isn’t it? Modern idiot liberals/leftists believe everyone (and every group) is secretly identical beneath their skin and clothes — when nothing could be further from the truth. It’s an extremely dangerous belief because it justifies them welcoming Pakistani rape gangs with open arms and then denying they exist (while saying the white girls raped probably deserved it). It’s also caused the destruction of Western Europe in other ways.
At this point, most of Europe is doomed. I’m hoping we can turn it around in America.
Change It
The thing that I and other men resent about being a “default rapist” is that I am at no more risk of raping you than the average woman is.
So it’s in no way fair to me to treat me like I am. That you think you “have to” doesn’t change that fact.
Remememe
I’m old enough to remember when liking women did not mean you hate women.
Suffer Then
First, that’s not what happened. The girl in question said she was uncomfortable with any man being in the store at all. And last I checked, VS was open to all sexes and genders. I’ve been asked at least twice in my life by women to go there and get something for them. Did not in fact see any “Women Only” sign at the entrance.
Second, it does indeed sound like a lot of women are just begging to go full burqa/sharia. And let them, I guess. I don’t think they’d like it much, but a lot of those clowns do seem to crave Islam already for some ignorant-ass reason.
Let them suffer.
Ten Up
I played against a low-ranked professional tennis player once (about 1,500th in the world if I recall correctly). He could beat me so easily that he didn’t even really need to look at the ball or do anything. I was no more effective against him than I would be at fighting a T. Rex. It was laughable.
Yes, pro athletes practice, but practice is not what makes them a pro. He was (like all pro athletes) simply far more physically genetically gifted in a way that even good amateurs are not. Because he had no illusions about his skills or prospects (he basically played tennis for fun), I asked him how much better Roger Federer (the #1 at the time) was than him. He said that Federer could not likely defeat him as easily as he did me, but he’d be “lucky to even beat him [Federer] in a set one out of a hundred times, and I’d have no chance of winning a match ever.”
People have no fucking idea how much better pro athletes are than even good amateurs. Just none. It’s an absolutely staggering world of difference.
For the pro I am talking about, I only managed to get one ball by him and that’s because he stumbled once on the rough court. That is the only reason I got anything at all past him. If we’d been playing on a good court, it would’ve been zero.
Perspex
Is it true that most guys would be willing to have sex their female friends?
No.
I think my female friends are all extremely beautiful. And I like them a whole lot. But I don’t want to have sex with them. And I would not if offered. Hell, I stayed in a hotel room in London with a close female friend (separate beds) for two days and was not even tempted. Not that she’s not lovely — she is. But it’s just not what either of us is really looking for.
Unlike what a lot of women believe, men aren’t always after sex and we are not thinking about it constantly. That’s merely the ~5% of men you encounter the most frequently.
What women imagine men want and what men actually want are often very, very different things.
Keyed Up
Big corps are pushing evil passkeys more and more. I’ll be resisting as long as I can, but it won’t last forever.
The future kinda sucks.
No Lock
That’s right. Women do not understand men very well at all. Because they do not have to. Men very much do have to understand women, however, if they ever want to get a date, etc.
Thus, women often conclude (with no evidence) that men do things that women mostly actually do, but that in fact men rarely do. It’s 99% projection. “Locker room” talk? Almost all women. Bedpost notching (metaphorically speaking)? Mostly (but not exclusively) women. Women are even somewhat more likely to share intimate photos of their partners than men are. Which is pure evil if non-consensual, I might add.
Women know nearly nothing about men, generally speaking, and have nearly no empathy for men. It’s quite amusing when you realize that, and how much of what they “know for certain” about men is merely weird projection.
Divergence
Exactly. 18 is where we’ve decided the dividing line is. Accept it or work to get it changed.
We should not treat one sex like they are children until they are 40. And if decide to do that (which seems to be the way a lot of women want it to go), we should work to get them declared minors with all that entails until that age.
Applied It
In line with recent “feminist” declarations that they are able to revoke freely-made decisions retroactively, I hereby retract my decision to buy Applied Materials stock in 1999, on which I lost about $20,000.
In retrospect, I did not consent to buying that stock. I would not have done so had I known the outcome in advance. Someone owes me $40,000 (number inclusive of inflation). Whoever allowed this violated my consent by not making this stock purchase go exactly as I expected it to.
Users
I just had a user asking me to allow claude to have complete access to his Microsoft mailbox. I told him no since sensitive mails are often sent to the entire company including discussions concerning projects etc.
He went silent and then said … "but how do you use your mail then ?"
I had to explain to him that we old people used mail for decades without the use of an AI telling us what someone mailed.
He was genuinely baffled how you can just open Outlook and read a mail without asking Claude what someone had sent.
I see more and more of this type of thing.
Users have never understood much or been capable of achieving anything left unsupervised, but AI has certainly made it worse. And it’s only downhill from here in that respect.