Falling Further

Noah Smith ๐Ÿ‡๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ (@Noahpinion) / X

That’s my conclusion too. “Progressives” are stuck in the past with AI and seem completely determined to stay there. Meanwhile, AI models (LLM+reasoning) already work really well and are improving all the time. For instance, I can do things with Claude it couldn’t come close to doing six months ago. They are also getting cheaper.

So progressives will fall further behind and look more clownish all the time. Which is fine with me.

De Facto Is

_s.a.m.e.m.e.m.e_ on X: "Libtards spent years calling any character design with breasts or curves "porn-brained" or "gooner bait," then they turn around and insist on how "horny" stuff like this is, suggesting you should turn into a psycho jerking-off monkey at the mere sight of it, then if you say you" / X

Heh.

It always made me laugh when “feminists” would criticize some character design where a woman in a video game had breasts that actually moved a little when she did something athletic. Like, have you seen a woman in the real world do anything? Come the fuck on you fucking clowns.

These are the same vile women who don’t want you to see women competing on TV unless they are in burqas. The left really is moving to de facto Islam. So fucking oddball.

38 24

Whatโ€™s everyoneโ€™s thoughts on a 38 year old man dating a 24 year old woman?

You’re both full-ass adults. Go for it, and who gives a damn what anyone else thinks.

We need to not treat grown women like children and men as default rapists/groomers. Having a connection and compatibility with someone is far, far more important than what the new gen Church Ladies think. You both might miss out on something wonderful because of some irrelevant clown? Come on.

That this dude gives so much of a fuck what anyone else thinks demonstrates that in reality he’s probably more immature than she is.

Severe Limitations

No idea the answer. This is the sort of problem I could look at for years and never solve. I saw the answer and still don’t understand it and probably never will. My brain just fundamentally does not work this way.

And I know you think you could explain it to me and I’d understand it, but I promise you I never would.

Double Stand

Nils Gilman (@nilsgilman.bsky.social) โ€” Bluesky

Look, I’m not the biggest Elon fan but this is absolutely fucking moronic.

This doofish “analysis” lumps together three very different things. Teslaโ€™s carbon credits arenโ€™t tax dollars and have nothing to do with taxes. Theyโ€™re paid by other automakers, including in China and the EU, that miss emissions targets. Most of the rest is SpaceX contracts, which pay for actual launches, crew flights and satellite service, very often cheaper than the alternatives. Thatโ€™s no more โ€œmilkingโ€ than Boeing or Lockheed getting paid for what they build (also highly subsidized by these standards!). By any count, the total is dwarfed by the auto bailout, and fossil fuels get roughly that much in federal support every damn year. And his fortune is mostly stock in his companies, not government checks. The only fair critique is that public money was crucial to SpaceX and Tesla surviving early on, which is hypocritical when contrasted with Muskโ€™s attacks on government spending.

And you know what, I am absolutely fine with public money going towards advancing the interests of the nation and improving tech; that makes everyone’s life better. We should have industrial policy and it should do things like this (and far, far more). Subsidies aren’t inherently bad1. They are how we get more of what we want and need.

I do agree that no one should be allowed to be as rich as Elon, but that’s not what this is talking about.

I just do not understand why otherwise-smart people wish to beclown themselves this way. It is undignified.

  1. Hell, I am old enough to remember when liberals were fully behind subsidies all over the place when it advanced their political agenda.