I wish to superglue everyone’s tongue who had anything to do with WebExtensions at Mozilla to an angry ferret.
That is all.
I wish to superglue everyone’s tongue who had anything to do with WebExtensions at Mozilla to an angry ferret.
That is all.
Iโm getting so mad watching this. How often do you get an opportunity to hit a total stranger in the face without getting in trouble? https://t.co/mZJqNUpVUg
— wanye (@xwanyex) December 10, 2025
Lord, that guy is a loser. He should put down the soy latte and get to a damn backbone replacement surgeon ASAP.
He was just like, “Guess this girlfriend’s done for, I’ll find another one.”
Key to my photography is that I have nothing in my house that is ugly. That's it. I don't have the prettiest things, I just refuse to have ugly stuff.
This leads to nice photos. People say they are staged! https://t.co/TH9Z0A38Ac
— Simon Sarris (@simonsarris) December 9, 2025
That’s ok, dude. People used to say my photos were staged too. But no, I am just damn good.
What makes it funny is these were mostly nature and wildlife photos that received this complaint. It remains a mystery to me exactly how the fuck people thought I got an alligator to stand anywhere, or a bird to fly and land somewhere. Or any wild animal to do anything. But, sure, “staged.” Clown idiots rule all.
Like half the posts on Reddit now are some Gen Z goofus complaining about how sex is icky. They sound like little kids worried about cooties even if they’re 27.
No, you fuckwit, some of us are just actually introverts. Jesus Fucking Christ I can’t even with these typa dipshits.
My introversion has nothing to do with unwanted emotions. In the army, people thought I was funny. Thought I was cool. I had many friends. More friends than I’ve ever had anywhere else. And you know what? I still needed a lot of alone time to recover from hanging out. No matter what. I know it’s so so hard for extroverts to accept, but introverts actually do exist.
Why are extroverts like this? What the fuck is wrong with them?
I suspect now that I’ve written add-ons that are at the edge of what Firefox is capable of doing, the clown-ass motherfuckers who call themselves “developers” in charge of the application will find out and nuke all that functionality.
Can’t have anything actually useful, can we? Of course not.
One of the reasons I haven’t written much about what my add-ons actually do is because I am fairly sure a few of those doofs who banned me from Reddit due to criticism of Mozilla still stalk this blog.
Where do they go to find dipshits like this?
Basic UI: A menu entry that includes text and a visual element (photo, icon, symbol) is more distinguishable and can be identified more quickly than one with only one of those items.
It seems we’ve just chosen to ignore 50+ years of UI/UX research and lessons and sprint headlong towards the clown crap this crappy clown wants. I cannot understand it. He’s simply wrong. Not as a guess or a preference or an opinion, but just objectively incorrect about how human brains, vision systems and UI/UX work and what they’re even for.
Icons and/or symbols increase the distinguishability and legibility even if the icon isn’t by itself enough to know what a menu items does. People do not do their homework anymore and they don’t know anything. It’s all just unwarranted guesses and out of left field completely-unresearched assumptions.
From my perspective, no matter what a lot of people’s IQ actually is, most people seem to have the intelligence level of a lead-poisoned toddler. Are people even trying anymore? Doesn’t appear so.
That chart is talked about all the time on this website, and it is wrong every time.
A better chart: https://t.co/TkY8NFFCS1 pic.twitter.com/AeVeq5QmP1
— Jeremy Horpedahl ๐ฅ๐ (@jmhorp) December 7, 2025
Oh, fucking clown. Real product compensation is not a good measure of inflation or compensation as the average worker experiences it. This is just an over-educated attempt to sneak something in that most people won’t know what it means to make himself look clever while dunking on his enemies. Well I’m smarter than he is by far and here’s why it’s bunk.
RPC is based on the Producer Price Index, which is a measure of the price of what firms sell. The worker & family actually experiences inflation as the Consumer Price Index (or at least far closer to), which is rent, food, healthcare and all those essentials of living. So, check this out: if the price of making things rises faster than the CPI, real product compensation will make the worker look much better off even if their actual cost of living isnโt improving much at all.
In other words, as usual this econ is attempting to con you. After all, it’s right in the name of the profession. It’s what most of them are paid to do.
There’s about five other things wrong with this RPC way of measure this but I just don’t have time to write about them all. A clownish asinine dipshit is all this dude is. Should’ve gotten a real education somewhere, but probably doesn’t have the brain to handle it.
To those who say AI isn’t a substantive advance (or even more absurdly, a “plagiarism machine”) you’re wrong. No, it’s not a tech Jesus and it’s not the end of the humans on earth as the AI cultists imagine, but it’s at least the equivalent of gene sequencing + editing or other tech like that.
Most of you have a GIGO problem with AI — garbage in, garbage out. And here’s the thing: you’re the garbage in that equation.
And no, I didn’t vote for Trump and I wouldn’t vote for him if he somehow ran again.
I just hate hypocritical clown liars on either side. That’s all.
Matt Taibbi was talking on his podcast about how no one flinched during Obamaโs presidency when theyโd carry out the โdouble tapโ drone strikes:
Theyโd drop a bomb on some ostensible terrorists.
And then theyโd wait and drop another bomb on the first responders: maybe some moreโฆ
— Coddled Affluent Professional (@feelsdesperate) December 7, 2025
Indeed. Obama started this. That doesn’t make it right (or wrong). But it was a precedent. Pretending like this began with Trump is false and makes (as is typical lately) the liberal side look deranged. After all, they cheered like mad when their lord and savior Obama did exactly the same thing.
Something I realized during the utterly-moronic AI water usage “debate” is that a lot of progressive degrowther types believe that when water is used somewhere, it literally disappears. Like, they think it poofs into hydrogen and oxygen or just evacuates the universe altogether.
And…dang. I have no words for whatever is going on there. But here’s some anyway: Water is nearly infinitely-renewable. No, this doesn’t solve the problems of cities like Tehran or a lot of India. Though those are in fact soluble (see what I did there) problems. Other than water that is de-molecularized in a few industrial processes and relatively-rare chemical reactions, there is as much fresh water on planet earth now as there was when humans evolved. Yes, of course, how we use it matters. And we could do a lot better at that.
However, when I realized that very many prog types believe that when water runs through a data center loop for 30 seconds it is somehow annihilated and vanishes from the universe forever, I was both disappointed and agog.
Among the many mistakes of the left, it was a pretty big one portraying all immigrants as faultless saints while characterizing anyone born in the US as a hopelessly hateful hillbilly.
And that went about as well for them as the rest of the idiotic shit they’ve done.
That is how crashes work. AI is not going anywhere. Did the internet disappear when the dot com bubble popped in 2001? Because I think I still see me some internet around here.
Just because you want something or believe something doesn’t mean you must live in fantasy world. Why do so many people do this?