Narcissus Without Beauty

Gen Z and the wokesters demand art that perfectly conforms to their beliefs and naรฏve intuitions about how the world should work. But good art is supposed to change you. If you don’t walk out of a cinema or a museum or a play or a symphony feeling like at least somewhat of a different person with an altered set of possibilities arrayed before you, that art has failed.

Instead of being changed by art, Gen Z and the woke crowd demand that art be a mirror that shows only their own reflection.

That is not what art is for.

Incellent

This is mostly wrong and bad advice. Though there is very little actual advice here.

The thing is, incels are substantially correct about their — and most men’s — disadvantages in the dating market. The majority of women really do attempt to date the top 10% of men nearly-exclusively, and unhappily settle for less when they turn out not to be at that tier themselves. Men really do risk life-altering consequences for making even a polite approach. I could go on. But suffice it to say, incels diagnose their own and society’s problems fairly accurately. Also, Noah’s data in his piece is very misleading, and designed to be so. Some of it just plain wrong.

We’ll ignore that for now. However, along with the incels being correct about their problems their noxious beliefs about what they should do in response follow. And those are farcically bad. Their suggested remedies will not help them, society, or anyone. It will only further embitter them and cause yet more ostracism.

Another impediment to proceptivity is the fear of rejection. In American culture, men are expected to take the lead romantically, and this means theyโ€™ll often end up getting rejected. A lot of guys are so scared of this rejection that they dread even trying to date in the first place.

The risk of nuclear rejection now is too high. Many women go ape on you just for asking them out these days. No guy wants their entire life destroyed because they asked some overentitled prick of a woman out for coffee and she ruins their life. And that is a real risk now.

Noah’s “advice” is non-advice, like nearly all such monitions from those who are reasonably successful romantically. What paltry guidance there is, it will not aid you, and will only cause more women to disdain you. Avoid this nonsense. It’s no better than dating advice from a woman, which is always useless for men.

Bubbling

What Sort of AI Bubble Are We In?

This post is wrong, but it is wrong in an interesting way. That is, it posits all these possible future states of AI bubble popping, but begs the question1 by assuming there is a bubble at all. This reminds me of people talking about the “cloud bubble” back in 2013-2016. Well, there wasn’t one. AWS, Azure and others printed money after that “bubble” proved not to be anything of the sort.

And the funny thing is that if this person is correct and the bubble does pop, AI will then be cheaper than it was before. Because that’s what happens when an excess floods the market. See housing post-2008 for a recent-ish example.

Real AI is probably the most useful and efficacious tool we’ve gotten in the computing space since the GUI. At the very least. My guess is that it’ll end up being more consequential than that due to spillover effects.

Oh, by the way, by “interesting” I meant “clownish.” Because that’s what the piece is. Doltish bien-pensant non-thinking.

  1. And I do here mean the original sense of question-begging.

The Claims

Ian Welsh (and his ilk) claim that strength is worthless and “just for show.”

But I just did a minor bit of home maintenance that I would not have been able to do when I was weak, and that my partner (though also quite strong) was not able to complete as she was not quite strong enough.

So I’ll take my “worthless” gym strength over being a feeble and wrong doofus any day of the week.

Too Many

Too many women are like, “OMG men find attractive women attractive and that should be banned (unless it’s me)!”

Like, do you even hear yourself? Of course not. People with any self-awareness and a clue about life don’t act like a loser prat.

Und Fic

Kat Rosenfield (@katrosenfield) / X

I agree with Kat that this dumbass take that “writing about something is condoning and endorsing it” is not exclusive to liberals, but it has become far more prominent among them over the past decade or more. Gen Z seems incapable of understanding fiction at all, and believes that anything written about no matter the context must 100% match the feelings and desires of the author.

Art is doomed with this attitude. I cannot understand why this absurdly clownish belief became culturally mainstream, but it is now. And the world and art is vastly worse because of it.

Call Att

Bold strategy. Don’t think that one is gonna work for them. Liberal cities and states are the worst governed, unfortunately. LA can’t even build houses where houses used to be that were lost in a tragic fire. It’s reprehensible.

Teams and Schemes

The “transitory” disphit-ass fucknuggests were wrong at the time, wrong when they declared victory, wrong now, and will continue to be wrong in the future.

Transitory it was not. It was so annoying when Team Transitory was declaring victory when inflation was still 40% above the US historical norm. And it still is. Just shows that to most people, facts and reality do not matter even a little bit. Being on the right team does.

Reduced

_s.a.m.e.m.e.m.e_ on X: "Not to mention, young men were sold on the idea of equality between the sexes in all things. Now, they're being told "actually this whole equality thing actually means that women get access to male privileges, but not male responsibilities (which men are still expected to bear),"" / X

That is basically how it has shaken out.

A lot of “feminists” want all the privileges but none of the responsibility nor accountability. Nice gig if you can get it. But it probably won’t last. History shows that people who demand to be treated like children in some areas invariably are reduced to that in all areas.