We have to get over this countermathematical notion that if you say something has a 20 percent chance of happening and it happens, you were wrong.
If you roll a fair die, you have a 16.6 percent chance of rolling a two. If you do roll a two, guess what? Model was still right! https://t.co/yqxo5M3trr
โ Linda Holmes Thinks Youโre Doing Great (@lindaholmes) October 1, 2020
Unfortunately, elections are not math and occur only once. Therefore, models arenโt much use. At least not nearly as useful as people like Holmes like to pretend they are.
This is where quant/math people utterly fail to understand the real world. I canโt believe weโre still re-litigating the โbut the polls were right!โ bullshit from 2016, when the โexpertsโ got their ass handed to them. The problem is, they are talking about the national polls and itโs the state polls that matter due to the electoral college.
Aside from all that, thereโs too much philosophy and epistemology here to write about. Butโฆpretending that no matter what your model says that youโre right has nothing to do with what anyone who is not a math geek wants or needs. In my opinion, election polls and models should never be made public. Itโs harmful and also fairly useless.