Thinking again about the European refugee crisis, it always seems that when society is forced to make a choice between the welfare of women and the promotion of some ideology, the advance of neoliberalism or any societal trade-off, that it is always women who are the sacrificial pawn.
In many ways that makes those who so easily forsake the rights, hopes and dreams of women to other aims and other causes just as morally deficient as the refugees and their children (and children’s children) doing the harassing and assaulting and making people feel and be unsafe in their home cities.*
This culpability is also true in the case of the ACA and many other modern “deals” where women were the sacrifice gambit that allowed the compromise to proceed.
The refugees are easy to blame. And I do blame them. But it’s not their fault they were displaced by climate change and war, or that some political leader allowed them to be embedded in a culture that they are unsuited for and deleterious to.
And I blame them for making life noticeably worse for people I know and like, and making those people desire to become refugees themselves.
But to be fair — and to be rational — wider social and political happenings must be examined — for instance, why would Merkel allow this to happen? Why would so many other political leaders? It’s not charity or for the good of their nations — we are long past that time in history.
Only in understanding this can you properly apportion the blame.
The refugees, the women already present in the countries being destroyed and most men are just game pieces in some larger pursuit. Understand this or you understand nothing.
The refugees and the harm they are doing to their host societies is the point, not some side effect.
*For instance, the US bombing everyone to freedom is another example of this.
\\ why would Merkel allow this to happen?
What is your answer to this question? How is the harm beneficial? To whom?
Also, I predict extremists in EU countries becoming stronger and capable of doing quite a damage both to refugees and anybody seen as the “Other.” Won’t the public lead to stop of massive immigration, when enough Europeans move Right on the issue?
My answer is that it is an intentional destabilization of the polity by fostering deliberate sectarianism and insular tendencies to help break the social welfare state that has held in most of Western Europe since WWII.
This is a major goal of most of the EU leadership who are beholden to no electorate (save the rich).
The refugees are only one prong of this plan, but now a major one. It’s not that the EU apparatchik deliberately created the refugee crisis, but they do fully into to take advantage of the opportunity it provides them.