Where I grew up, the biggest thugs got with the most women by far. It wasn’t even close. Hell, I got with more women after I broke bad.
It’s just a fact of life.
Annoying
Scared Of
How to stop being scared of men.
This is a great example of a woman interacting with men who are almost all going to be weirdos, creeps and clowns and then concluding all men are that way.
To be fair, at least she’s trying to change her ideas and perceptions. Most never even attempt that. She deserves some real credit for that.
As one commenter said, “‘All I do is hang out in a garbage dump. Why is the world just full of so much garbage?'” And the thing is, this is what most women do.
Men need to (and are trained to) control their aggression. Likewise, women should be taught to control their excessive neuroticism. But this is considered out of bounds to express, though it should not be. Women need this acculturation just as much as men need to be educated on how rein in aggressive tendencies.
False Acc
Contrary to feminist propaganda, women do in fact lodge quite a lot of false accusations when it’s advantageous for them to do so. Because, duh, they are are human and that is their leverage. People exercise power where they think they possess it.
The best way to avoid those is to not be anywhere or do anything where that could occur. Which means good men will act in accordance with that, and women will only have experiences with the bad ones who do not care about social niceties. Pretty predictable end result of consensual sex between grown-ass adults being de facto criminalized by “feminists” IMO — and of all men being branded as rapist predators for being attracted to attractive women.
Strait Up
Well, yeah, the Strait of Hormuz has extremely strong currents which makes it difficult to effectively mine. This is not some failure of Iran. This is just a natural feature of a strait like that. No one knows where those mines are now and probably never will.
New Golden Rule
If you let a buncha feral third worlders into your country, you’re gonna have a bad time.
Real Wrong
This is not really (heh) correct. At the least, it’s lazy thinking. But truly, it’s just wrong enough to seem pat and true to Mastodon types but is even more misleading than the supposedly-confusing ideas it’s attempting to illuminate.
The problem is that complex numbers are not secretly just real numbers. Though they are a larger algebraic system that can be faithfully represented using real pairs or special real matrices, the posts above confuse the fact that you can represent complex numbers using real-number machinery with the incorrect idea that complex numbers are truly nothing but ordinary real numbers. A metaphor that perhaps this doof could understand: GPS coordinates are not the city. You can encode every place in a city with two numbers, but the city is not secretly just a system of coordinates. The coordinates are a way of keeping track of something else. And the same is the case here. A real pair or matrix model is a way of (only) encoding complex numbers, not a proof that complex numbers were ordinary reals all along. I mean, duh. If you’re not a dipshit.
So that part of the posts is 100% wrong. A representation is not the same thing as an identification. Encoding complex numbers as pairs or matrices does not somehow convert them back into the real numbers. All it shows is that the complex numbers can be realized as a structured extension built from real components.
And I know this at least partially because standard quantum mechanics requires complex numbers. There are indeed physics-equivalent reformulations using only real quantities, but these work only if you add extra structure that is basically smuggling in complex numbers by the back door (that don’t correspond to the world as it apparently is), so just reals is not enough.
I hate this typical Mastodon intellectual clownishness. So fucking worthless.
Chili’s
Anyone read this 49 day SSL expiration thing and think they would rather just retire?
Yes. It’s such a fucking clownish, useless idea that is going to make my life worse and many other people’s too for absolutely zero real-world security benefit.
The shit-for-brains set of doofuses who thought of this should be run out of the industry and be require to work at a Chili’s in Duluth until they expire from despair.
What a huge waste of time and resources that is going to lead to more security issues, not fewer.
Never Accept
That’s the same as clowns screaming, “Climate change is fake!” as they die in a climate-change-caused natural disaster.
The Screech
It is amazing to witness the BlueSky screechers caterwaul — meanwhile, we have AIs finding solutions to previously-unsolved math problems, discovering so many zero-days the results couldn’t even be released, and just generally doing all manner of useful shit.
There’s being a bit behind the times and there’s being a complete clown idiot. For some reason, the left has chosen the latter and then doubled down every day since.
Cropshare
Mostly agreed. I’ve of course personally never owned slaves, and my family has mostly been poor since forever. It’s doubtful anyone in my lineage going back hundreds of years had anything to do with slavery — my grandfather on my mom’s side in fact grew up a sharecropper in rural Georgia, which is just a step or two above being enslaved.
Western societies get a bad rap for colonialism because those who can attempt to extract resources from where those resources exist. While there were some genuine evils perpetrated, most often, though, the civilizations already present were even worse.
Jetting
Much that happens in California is quite clownish.
All Kindsa Wrong
This is an actual question on the official study guide of a cert (CISM) I am studying for. And it is egregiously, laughably wrong in every aspect. (The bolded answer is what it thinks is correct.)
1) “IP Security v6” is not a real protocol name. There is nothing called that anywhere in my field. There is IPSec, which applies to both IPv4 and IPv6.
2) The explanation about source and destination IPs being inside the encrypted portion is false in general. Too detailed to go into here, but it just does not work like that at all.
3) MITM resistance in IPsec comes from authenticated key exchange and integrity, not from hiding IP addresses.
4) Even good ol’ IPsec does not prevent MITM in all deployment types. Pre-shared keys, for example, are vulnerable such that an MITM attacker can obtain an OTP and log in as the remote user. Also, pretty-common NULL-authenticated IPsec completely does not protect against MITM and should be treated like plaintext traffic in almost all cases.
That question is just wrong in fifty-eleven different ways. Amazing that is on a study guide. But networking is usually the worst area on anything like this as no one knows what the hell they are talking about ever in that field (see the clownishly asinine NAT ISN’T A FIREWALL AND OFFERS NO SECURITY bullshit the Hacker News-type doofs always spout).
Market Fit
Got in a little trouble at work because I refused to let the marketing department make any changes to the technical documents and info I send to customers.
But I don’t care. Nope, not gonna do it, never gonna happen.
It’s Final
You do have to wonder what kind of ridiculously strong crack they are all smoking.
Bisc
Every political side has quite a few absolutely tardbiscuit beliefs that they just cannot give up.
The left:
1) Binary sex isn’t real.
2) No evolution occurred above the neck.
3) Humans are a blank slate (and all related to that).
The right:
1) Climate change isn’t real.
2) Vaccines don’t work.
3) Markets automatically solve everything.
No side has any monopoly on truth or thinking coherently. Which is why I have no side.