Last Gasps

Naw, they’d never admit it.

Their logic goes like this:

1) I wasn’t personally affected as I already worked from home and/or was unemployed, so there were no lockdowns.

2) If there were lockdowns and kids couldn’t go to school, it was only like two days.

3) Ok, there were some extremely short “fake” lockdowns and kids couldn’t go to school, but the kids love working in the fields and mines like olden times, so it was ok.

4) There weren’t any lockdowns because no one’s door was welded shut and no one was arrested (in the US).

5) People should have had their doors welded shut and should have been shot if they tried to evade the non-existent lockdowns.

6) I love lockdown and wish it were still happening, even though it didn’t ever happen.

In the end, this group of still-extant lockdown lifers and lockdown liars is just angry that the pandemic didn’t result in their preferred political alterations. That, and many of them are obsessive busybody neurotics who can’t operate well socially. Most of them are also clownish forever-maskers and extremely mentally ill.

AfD See

People are really puzzled that no one wants roving foreign rape gangs in their countries? Like, to you that’s a real mystery why people don’t want that?

You’ve got to be playing, right, if you don’t understand why that’d turn people against immigration? Come the fuck on.

Offtraded

Noah is terrible at economics, but this I agree with this completely. Without nation-states and border enforcement, liberalism is done. That’s even ignoring the feral third world rapist problem. The basic function of a nation is controlling who is a member of that nation so as to not break the polity therein apart completely.

And, mostly, we are failing at that now. Just because something hurts your tiny little feelings doesn’t make it untrue. It just means there are tradeoffs. As there are everywhere and always.

Cash Up

Yeah, that dude is a fucking clown. She was just trying not to be short at the end of the night.

An extremely common scam is for someone to give you too much money, and then to attempt to confuse you about change. Cashiers get this all the time. I have complete sympathy for that poor woman and want to kick this douche in the kneecaps.

Nazified

It really is the case these days if you are to the right of Hasan Piker, you’re a “Nazi.” In the 1990s, the German AfD as it is now would’ve been just a fairly standard center-liberal party, going by their positions. Now according the press they are evil incarnate and Mega-MechaHitler.

So odd to see. I’m about the same politically as I was in the 1990s: a fairly standard liberal. Now that makes me a Nazi, too.

Alrighty then.

Was There

memetic_sisyphus on X: "COVID is such a funny topic for anyone who has a memory longer than 6 years. The right at the beginning was concerned about this disease and called for locking down travel from infected countries. The left called this racist, Nancy Pelosi went to China town and told people to hug" / X

I remember all of that! I also had friends messaging me at the start of the pandemic claiming that masks don’t work who later became extremely, ardently pro-masking. And you know what, it’s ok to change your mind given new evidence or in this case re-evaluation of the existing data.

What I object to is when someone treats me like the bad guy for being able to recall quite recent history, even if it paints people in a negative light. That I strongly refuse to play along with.

I won’t call them out by name, but I also had a friend (who is still a friend) insist that no one had ever said “hug a Chinese person” and that it did not happen that for two months the liberals claimed that believing Covid was a threat was racist. But all that stuff occurred. I remember; I was there. A lot of it is now “conspiracy-theorized” and memory-holed and more will be in the future as the truth is sanded down to what feels good.

Message Divergence

One of the reasons for the current gender war is the messages men and women receive as they grow up have diverged a lot since the 1990s.

During the ’90s, both genders were told roughly this: Strive for equality while doing the best you can. Everyone deserves a fair shot. Be as egalitarian as possible and ethical while trying to do what you love. Most people are trying their best and while there are some differences between the sexes, we all have to work together.

Now women receive this messaging: You are special faultless snowflake sparkle princess who deserves the best always. Accountability and responsibility should never touch you; you are a child until you are 40. If that top 0.01% man you so richly deserve doesn’t find you, no one else should darken your door; it’s best to just stay single.

And men are told at the same time: You are by default evil and disposable. Also, a rapist by dint of being born male. This condition is inescapable and women are right to hate you (unless you are one of those top 0.01% men, where your proper role is to be a walking wallet). If you object to any of these obviously-correct assumptions about you, that means you are even worse: an “incel” who should be shamed and shunned by all.

It’s no damn mystery why the two sexes hate one another now as feminism turned pure evil. Nothing else really could’ve occurred.

Left Make

Joke is on you, moron. The woman has makeup on in both photos. Just much more in the one on the left. (I strongly prefer the right photo because it’s “natural” makeup, which many men mistake for no makeup.)

Use Your Words

Does anyone else find it strange that women (speaking very generally here) insist they are masters of communication and have high empathy, but most of what men see of them is that they are terrible at actually communicating — relying on opaque and/or invisible hints and desiring mind-reading — and have very little empathy for men?

A protective self-image is often very different from the reality on the ground.

Not Int

I had a friend who didn’t believe in the ability to just know things. He thought that if you couldn’t prove it mathematically it did not exist. In his universe, there was zero room for intuition.

A good example is being able to distinguish songs in a major and minor key. Like most people with musical training and interest, I can determine if a song is in a major or minor key in 2-3 bars. It’s not even hard. It is in fact ridiculously easy.

But he claimed I could not do it because I could not definitively say and then prove on paper which actual key a piece was in most of the time.

Now anyone who knows anything about music knows that these two things are related, but knowing a piece of music is in Bโ™ญ major or F minor has nothing to do with the fact that you can just listen to it and tell that it’s performed in a major or minor key.

And the same for him with anything else. Even though I had a better understanding of relativity as it actually works in this universe, he claimed I did not know anything about it because I could not work out quickly every equation to do with it. Yet he consistently got most answers wrong that required actually thinking about how relativity worked.

To him, “knowledge” wasn’t actual understanding — it was something a lot more mechanistic and constrained. Because he did not actually understand any of the equations he could work out at all or what they might mean for the world.

I think this is fairly common among STEM types, by the way. Which is why I bring it up. Such an oddball way to view the universe and what knowing something means.

I’ll Be It

I don’t mind being called a “Nazi” by the very worst people in the world if it preserves civilization and keeps millions of women from being assaulted and raped.

Sure, I’ll be that “Nazi” any day of the week and twice on Sunday.

Share Fair

Men – whatโ€™s your honest to god feelings and reaction when women discuss โ€œmental loadโ€ in relation to household and child raising chores.

Men - whatโ€™s your honest to god feelings and reaction when women discuss โ€œmental loadโ€ in relation to household and child raising chores. : AskMen

“Mental load” is 90% neurotic bullshit and 10% real.

That said, yes to the comment I screenshotted. In a past relationship I took care of all car maintenance, yard maintenance, most household stuff (even though I am terrible at it), etc. But I was told none of that counted as a contribution because I “enjoyed doing that stuff” and “all men find that fun” even after I was very clear and very vociferous as to the fact that I did not in fact find any of that enjoyable, but was just doing it out of necessity.

It was merely a way for her to still have me do 50% of the other housework, too. In reality, I did something like 80% of the actual household work, while she thought she was doing most of it — because to her my contributions didn’t count because they were “fun.” This is incredibly common with women, from what I hear and have experienced (luckily not at all with my current partner). And after the woman I am talking about found out I didn’t mind washing dishes, those also didn’t count toward my contribution because I found them “fun” (in her mind).

So this is how you get to bogus numbers about men not doing their fair share. The vast majority are. Our labor is just not counted.