Spry

This is only humoral immunity, which means antibody-based. Cell-based immunity does not seem to be assayed at all, and is equally important in immune response. This is not a flaw of the study. It determined exactly what it was attempting to determine. It is, however, a flaw in interpretation that I see over and over again.

Also, this study used pseudoviruses, and says nearly nothing at all about actual clinical response. It canโ€™t; it wasnโ€™t conducted on real infections of the actual SARV-Cov-2 virus.

Can people, like, not read? What is the issue here? I know I am smarter than the average bear, but come the fuck on. This isnโ€™t that hard. Do the work or say nothing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *