Something that has bothered me for years in psychology and neurology are these ideas and this sort of construction and explanation of them.
Studies have shown that when peopleโs brains are stimulated in such a way as to trigger a physical movement, say, in the hand, the subjects report an intention to move their hand. The intention, โI want to move my hand,โ which feels like the cause, is actually an effect of the beginning of the motor sequence.
Even worse is the one that goes โthe signals that triggered a finger movement began a full half-second before any decision about movementโ and that sort of thing โ thus in the minds of the researchers disproving free will.
Iโm not here to argue about free will and Iโm trying to keep opaque philosophy terms out of this discussion, but hereโs whatโs wrong with all of this: itโs all you.
People think of the brain/mind/body in Cartesian dualist frames (oops, here come some of those terms, and yes I know that is a trinary) reflexively even when they think they have rejected it. There is no homunculus, no little being sitting in the cockpit somewhere in your pate just behind your dura mater issuing commands.
In reality, the brain is a motley collection of competing and cooperating systems that donโt have full monitoring capabilities of other systemโs states. When someone stimulates part of your brain to move your hand, and nothing else seems to be wrong, the rest of your brain is like, โHuh, guess I meant to do that. I [meaning that motley collection of oddball systems] wanted to do that.โ
Can you think of any evolutionary reason your brain would say, โThat ainโt me moving my hand! Must be some researcher stimulating it with an electrode!โ Seen many neurologists with electrodes on the African savanna a million year ago? No? I thought not.
The point Iโm making is that your brainโs systems canโt really be decoupled. When you move a finger, itโs all you, even the nerve impulse that started half a second before you โdecidedโ to move. (How can this research be this moronic?)
Itโs all you, baby. Itโs all you.